audit

<!-- 🔒 LOCKED — managed by clade · auto-generated by sync-to-agents; edit source in .claude/ then re-run sync --> ## MANDATORY PREPARATION Invoke /impeccable — it contains design principles, anti-patterns, and the **Context Gathering Protocol**. Follow the protocol before proceeding — if no design context exists yet, you MUST run /impeccable teach first. --- Run systematic **technical** quality checks and generate a comprehensive report. Don't fix issues — document them for other commands to address. This is a code-level audit, not a design critique. Check what's measurable and verifiable in the implementation. ## Diagnostic Scan Run comprehensive checks across 5 dimensions. Score each dimension 0-4 using the criteria below. ### 1. Accessibility (A11y) **Check for**: - **Contrast issues**: Text contrast ratios < 4.5:1 (or 7:1 for AAA) - **Missing ARIA**: Interactive elements without proper roles, labels, or states - **Keyboard navigation**: Missing focus indicators, illogical tab order, keyboard traps - **Semantic HTML**: Improper heading hierarchy, missing landmarks, divs instead of buttons - **Alt text**: Missing or poor image descriptions - **Form issues**: Inputs without labels, poor error messaging, missing required indicators **Score 0-4**: 0=Inaccessible (fails WCAG A), 1=Major gaps (few ARIA labels, no keyboard nav), 2=Partial (some a11y effort, significant gaps), 3=Good (WCAG AA mostly met, minor gaps), 4=Excellent (WCAG AA fully met, approaches AAA) ### ...