critique

Solid

Evaluate design from a UX perspective, assessing visual hierarchy, information architecture, emotional resonance, cognitive load, and overall quality with quantitative scoring, persona-based testing, automated anti-pattern detection, and actionable feedback. Use when the user asks to review, critique, evaluate, or give feedback on a design or component.

Web & Frontend 45 stars 2 forks Updated today MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 89/100

Stars 20%
55
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
80
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

<!-- ๐Ÿ”’ LOCKED โ€” managed by clade ยท auto-generated by sync-to-agents; edit source in .claude/ then re-run sync --> ## STEPS ### Step 1: Preparation Invoke /impeccable, which contains design principles, anti-patterns, and the **Context Gathering Protocol**. Follow the protocol before proceeding. If no design context exists yet, you MUST run /impeccable teach first. Additionally gather: what the interface is trying to accomplish. ### Step 2: Gather Assessments Launch two independent assessments. **Neither must see the other's output** to avoid bias. You SHOULD delegate each assessment to a separate sub-agent for independence. Use your environment's agent spawning mechanism (e.g., AI Agent's `Agent` tool, or Codex's subagent spawning). Sub-agents should return their findings as structured text. Do NOT output findings to the user yet. If sub-agents are not available in the current environment, complete each assessment sequentially, writing findings to internal notes before proceeding. **Tab isolation**: When browser automation is available, each assessment MUST create its own new tab. Never reuse an existing tab, even if one is already open at the correct URL. This prevents the two assessments from interfering with each other's page state. #### Assessment A: LLM Design Review Read the relevant source files (HTML, CSS, JS/TS) and, if browser automation is available, visually inspect the live page. **Create a new tab** for this; do not reuse existing tabs. After navigatio...

Details

Author
YuDefine
Repository
YuDefine/nuxt-supabase-starter
Created
4 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
JavaScript
License
MIT

Integrates with

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content โ€” not just same category

Code & Development Listed

critique

Evaluate design from a UX perspective, assessing visual hierarchy, information architecture, emotional resonance, cognitive load, and overall quality with quantitative scoring, persona-based testing, and actionable feedback. Use when the user asks to review, critique, evaluate, or give feedback on a design or component.

22 Updated 2 days ago
AkaraChen
AI & Automation Solid

critique

Evaluate design from a UX perspective, assessing visual hierarchy, information architecture, emotional resonance, cognitive load, and overall quality with quantitative scoring, persona-based testing, and actionable feedback. Use when the user asks to review, critique, evaluate, or give feedback on a design or component.

5,395 Updated today
fengshao1227
AI & Automation Solid

critique

Evaluate design from a UX perspective, assessing visual hierarchy, information architecture, emotional resonance, cognitive load, and overall quality with quantitative scoring, persona-based testing, and actionable feedback. Use when the user asks to review, critique, evaluate, or give feedback on a design or component.

389 Updated today
mxyhi
AI & Automation Solid

critique

Evaluate design from a UX perspective, assessing visual hierarchy, information architecture, emotional resonance, cognitive load, and overall quality with quantitative scoring, persona-based testing, and actionable feedback. Use when the user asks to review, critique, evaluate, or give feedback on a design or component.

240 Updated today
joewinke
AI & Automation Solid

critique

Evaluate design from a UX perspective, assessing visual hierarchy, information architecture, emotional resonance, cognitive load, and overall quality with quantitative scoring, persona-based testing, and actionable feedback. Use when the user asks to review, critique, evaluate, or give feedback on a design or component.

226 Updated yesterday
AkaraChen