security-evidence

Solid

Use when 要判一則 Codex Security finding 是真漏洞還是假警報(finding mode),或上線前要分清 repo / staging / production 各層還缺哪些安全證據(map mode)。NOT for 修 code、跑掃描、寫 SECURITY.md。

Code & Development 45 stars 3 forks Updated today MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 85/100

Stars 20%
55
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
84
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

<!-- 🔒 LOCKED — managed by clade Source: plugins/hub-core/skills/security-evidence/ Edit at: $CLADE_HOME Local edits will be reverted by the next sync. --> <!-- clade-targets: claude,codex,cursor --> <!-- clade-adapters: claude --> # security-evidence 兩個 mode,各對應一份逐字 prompt(`references/`)。**MUST 先讀 `modes.md` 判 mode,再讀對應 reference 全文照它的 context-gathering 逐步問**——它們刻意分小步等答案,不要一次把全部問題丟出去。 | mode | 什麼時候 | reference | 產物 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | `finding` | 一次一則 finding;報告出現 High / Medium、看不懂、有爭議、修之前 | `references/finding-evidence-explainer.md` | Finding Evidence Review:Source / Control / Sink、反證、Severity 與 Confidence 分開、Coverage、Proof Gaps、verdict(accept / needs more validation / unsupported) | | `map` | 上線前、重大改版、修完重要 finding、掃描回 No findings | `references/production-blind-spot-mapper.md` | Production Security Evidence Map:五層 Coverage、P0 / P1 / P2 清單(pass condition、evidence、owner)、scope-limited verdict | ## 讀取順序(唯讀) 1. target 的 `SECURITY.md`(安全憲法)——每一條 `INV-n` 都是判 counterevidence 的依據;沒有這份就先說明 Confidence 會被壓低 2. finding 原文(`<output_dir>/findings.json` 該條 + `report.md` 對應段)與 `coverage.json` 的 Coverage 3. 被點名的檔案及其直接 caller / callee;**NEVER** 無方向爬 codebase ## 出口 - verdict `accept` / `needs more validation` → 登 TD(consumer 自家 `docs/tech-debt.md`),`### 自驗` 寫 Proof Gap 的驗證動作;修完跑 `scripts/security-scan.ts verify --finding <id>` - verdict `unsupported` → 寫進本次 review 報告,不開 TD、不改 code - `map` 的 P0 / P1 每一項各登一條 TD,owner 缺就寫 `Owner Missing`,**NEVER** 自己指派 ## NEVER - NEVER 把 sc...

Details

Author
YuDefine
Repository
YuDefine/nuxt-supabase-starter
Created
7 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
JavaScript
License
MIT

Integrates with

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category