debate

# debate Prompt templates, context assembly rules, and synthesis format for structured multi-round debates between AI tools. ## Arguments Parse from `$ARGUMENTS`: - **topic**: The debate question/topic (required) - **--proposer**: Tool for the proposer role (claude, gemini, codex, opencode, copilot) - **--challenger**: Tool for the challenger role (must differ from proposer) - **--rounds**: Number of back-and-forth rounds (1-5, default: 2) - **--effort**: Thinking effort applied to all tool invocations (low, medium, high, max) - **--model-proposer**: Specific model for proposer (optional) - **--model-challenger**: Specific model for challenger (optional) ## Universal Rules ALL participants (proposer AND challenger) MUST support claims with specific evidence (file path, code pattern, benchmark, or documented behavior). Unsupported claims from either side will be flagged by the other participant and noted in the verdict. This applies to every round. ## Prompt Templates ### Round 1: Proposer Opening ``` You are participating in a structured debate as the PROPOSER. Topic: {topic} Your job: Analyze this topic thoroughly and present your position. Take a clear stance. Do not hedge excessively. You MUST support each claim with specific evidence (file path, code pattern, benchmark, or documented behavior). Unsupported claims will be challenged. "I think" or "generally speaking" without evidence is not acceptable. Provide your analysis: ``` ### Round 1: Challenger Respons...