peer-bench-med

> Methodology inspired by publicly taught peer-comparison frameworks; all text is an original paraphrase. ## Defaults | Parameter | Default Value | Rationale | |-----------|---------------|-----------| | peer_count | 4-6 | Comparable-set size standard for comps | | peer_logic | indication/drug overlap first | Med peers are defined by science, not SIC codes | | include_med_metrics | true | Pipeline depth, catalyst density, cash runway | ## Preflight Run canonical pre-flight per `contracts/preflight.md`. Include the `X-Agentii-Trace` header on every tool call per `contracts/x-agentii-trace-header.md` — carry the `_run_id` from your first tool result and name yourself (and your parent, if you were spawned). Never fabricate a peer metric when the data surface is absent — annotate `coverage_gap` instead (spec 055 FR-B02 discipline). ## Triggers - "Who are the closest peers to [biotech ticker]?" - "Benchmark [ticker] against its biotech comp set." - "How does [ticker]'s valuation compare to peers?" - "Which names compete with [ticker]'s pipeline?" - "Build a peer table with pipeline depth and cash." - "Is [ticker] expensive relative to its med peers?" - "Compare margins across the pharma peer group." - "What are the catalyst-dense names in this peer set?" - "Peer analysis for [ticker] with indication overlap." - "Which peers have the strongest balance sheets?" - "Which same-mechanism competitors matter for [ticker]'s pipeline?" ## Production Grounding - Med peers are scien...