double-check
SolidTargeted re-verification of a specific claim, output, or decision. Re-read sources, challenge, cross-reference, and deliver a verdict. Trigger when the user runs /double-check or asks to "verify this", "re-check this", "are you sure about this", "go over this again", or "make sure this is right". Not /verify (formal phase gate needing intent+plan+execution artifacts) or /insight-critique (advisory review of an output) — double-check is a quick targeted re-read of one claim.
Install
Quality Score: 78/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- allemaar
- Repository
- allemaar/open-skills
- Created
- 1 months ago
- Last Updated
- today
- Language
- JavaScript
- License
- Apache-2.0
Integrates with
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
doublecheck
Adversarial verification of implementation correctness. Runs 4 subagents that attack from different angles: gap finding, assumption attacking, ground truth verification, and devil's advocacy. Use after completing work, before releases, or to attack a plan before implementation.
double-check
Use whenever the user asks to double-check, cross-check, verify, recheck, sanity-check, or confirm prior analysis or results — including "are you sure", "are you confident", "is this true", "still true?", "prove it", "triple check", "check against" some artifact, "look again", "repeat the analysis", or "repeat your findings in full". Re-derives the answer from source artifacts and returns it standalone in the original request's structure — never a revision log of the prior turn. Also invoke before re-running any analysis whose output the user has already seen once. To repair a chat where a diff-shaped answer already happened, use the `double-check-align` skill.
double-check
Exhaustively validate every claim, number, calculation, code-fact, and command in a document or outbound communication. Extracts all claims into a prioritized ledger (flagging what is NOT covered), validates each by the right method (run the math, run the command, cite the file:line, quote the primary source), then calibrates certainty with CIA Words of Estimative Probability and a provenance tier — and proposes corrected, properly-hedged rewrites for any overclaim. Use before sending a message, filing an issue, committing analysis, or whenever you state exact numbers/assertions others will rely on.