feature-review

Solid

Review and prioritize features using RICE, WSJF, or Kano scoring frameworks, then create GitHub issues for suggestions.

Code & Development 308 stars 27 forks Updated today MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 96/100

Stars 20%

Recency 20%

100

Frontmatter 20%

Documentation 15%

100

Issue Health 10%

License 10%

100

Description 5%

100

Skill Content

## Table of Contents - [Philosophy](#philosophy) - [When to Use](#when-to-use) - [When NOT to Use](#when-not-to-use) - [Quick Start](#quick-start) - [1. Inventory Current Features](#1-inventory-current-features) - [2. Score and Classify](#2-score-and-classify) - [3. Generate Suggestions](#3-generate-suggestions) ## Verification Run `make test-feature-review` to verify scoring logic after changes. - [4. Upload to GitHub](#4-upload-to-github) - [Workflow](#workflow) - [Phase 1: Feature Discovery (`feature-review:inventory-complete`)](#phase-1:-feature-discovery-(feature-review:inventory-complete)) - [Phase 2: Classification (`feature-review:classified`)](#phase-2:-classification-(feature-review:classified)) - [Phase 3: Scoring (`feature-review:scored`)](#phase-3:-scoring-(feature-review:scored)) - [Phase 4: Tradeoff Analysis (`feature-review:tradeoffs-analyzed`)](#phase-4:-tradeoff-analysis-(feature-review:tradeoffs-analyzed)) - [Phase 5: Gap Analysis & Suggestions (`feature-review:suggestions-generated`)](#phase-5:-gap-analysis-&-suggestions-(feature-review:suggestions-generated)) - [Phase 6: GitHub Integration (`feature-review:issues-created`)](#phase-6:-github-integration-(feature-review:issues-created)) - [Configuration](#configuration) - [Configuration File](#configuration-file) - [Guardrails](#guardrails) - [Required TodoWrite Items](#required-todowrite-items) - [Integration Points](#integration-points) - [Output Format](#output-format) - [Feature Inventory Table](#fea...

Details

Author: athola
Repository: athola/claude-night-market
Created: 6 months ago
Last Updated: today
Language: Python
License: MIT

Integrates with

GitHub · DevTools

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

Code & Development Listed

code-review

Use when reviewing a pull request, diff, or proposed code change for correctness, clarity, security, performance, and conformance to project conventions — whether the author is a human, an AI agent, or a peer. Covers the pre-review fact-gathering pass, the read-order strategy (tests first, then implementation, then call sites), the severity-grading rubric, the comment-phrasing discipline, and the no-rubber-stamp rule for AI-generated diffs. Do NOT use for AUTHORING the code (use `refactor` for behaviour-preserving changes or `skill-scaffold` for new skills), for chasing a known bug after merge (use `debugging`), or for security-only audits (use `owasp-security` for vulnerability-focused review). Do NOT use for fix this bug that production users are reporting. Do NOT use for refactor this 200-line function into smaller pieces. Do NOT use for scaffold a new skill that teaches code review. Do NOT use for write a guide explaining our review conventions.

0 Updated yesterday

jacob-balslev

AI & Automation Listed

feature-workflow

Standard workflow for developing features. Follow this process for all non-trivial changes - from planning through PR merge. Ensures proper testing, review, and CI verification.

8 Updated 4 days ago

dzianisv

Code & Development Solid

pr-review

Scope-focused PR review with requirements validation and backlog triage

308 Updated today

athola