review

Solid

Validate plans, execution, or PRs against wish criteria — returns SHIP / FIX-FIRST / BLOCKED with severity-tagged gaps.

AI & Automation 321 stars 53 forks Updated today MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 86/100

Stars 20%
84
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# /review — Universal Review Gate Validate any artifact against its wish criteria. Dispatch as a subagent — never review your own work inline. ## Context Injection This skill receives its scope from the dispatch layer: - **Target** — what is being reviewed (wish draft, completed work, or PR diff) - **Wish path** — `.genie/wishes/<slug>/WISH.md` in the shared worktree - **Injected criteria** — acceptance criteria extracted from the wish If context is injected, use it directly. Do not re-parse for information already provided. ## When to Use - Before `/work` — validate a wish plan is ready for execution - After `/work` — verify implementation meets acceptance criteria - Before merge — check a PR diff against wish scope ## Flow 1. **Detect target** — determine what is being reviewed (wish draft, completed work, or PR diff). 2. **Select pipeline** — match target to Plan, Execution, or PR checklist below. 3. **Run checklist** — evaluate each criterion, collecting evidence. 4. **Run validations** — execute any validation commands; capture pass/fail output. 5. **Tag gaps** — classify every unmet criterion by severity. 6. **Return verdict** — one of SHIP, FIX-FIRST, or BLOCKED (see Verdicts). 7. **Write next steps** — exact fixes, files, and commands for each gap. ## Council Participation When a council team is active, the review can incorporate council perspectives: - Post review findings to team chat for council input via `genie chat post --team <team>` - Council members ma...

Details

Author
automagik-dev
Repository
automagik-dev/genie
Created
10 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
TypeScript
License
MIT

Integrates with

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

Code & Development Solid

review-plan

Review an implementation plan: launches an internal plan review and `/peer-review` in parallel and returns combined findings. Use when the user asks to "review my plan", "review this plan", "check my plan", "critique my plan", or wants plan feedback before implementation.

314 Updated today
tobihagemann
Code & Development Listed

review-work

Independent post-implementation review — an agent with no sunk-cost bias checks just-written code or an artifact against its requirements, then resolves the issues found (max 2 rounds). Use to verify a change before shipping, get a second opinion, or check what you missed; auto-triggers for security-sensitive and data-mutation code. Not for code refactoring (use clean-code) or decision analysis (use debate-agents).

10 Updated today
hungv47
Code & Development Listed

ai-review

Reviews code changes with human-quality judgment: PR reviews, file reviews, diff analysis, architecture feedback. Default mode runs the full specialist roster through 3 macro-agents; pass `--full` for one agent per specialist. Trigger for 'review this', 'give me feedback', 'look over my PR', 'any issues with this', 'is this merge-ready'. Not for evidence-backed gates; use /ai-verify instead. Not for narrative writing; use /ai-prose instead.

49 Updated today
arcasilesgroup
Code & Development Listed

plan-reviewer

Validate that a work plan is executable before work starts.

41 Updated today
antonbabenko
Code & Development Listed

review

Review a plan with Critic

6 Updated today
mazenyassergithub