docs-product

Solid

Product documentation branch — the 'why' and 'what' of a project: VISION.md, PRD.md, ROADMAP.md, FEATURES.md. Written from an idea forward, before engineering docs. Order: VISION -> PRD -> ROADMAP -> FEATURES. Full catalog + checklist in references/product-docs.md, templates in templates/. Triggers: 'продуктовая документация', 'vision', 'prd', 'роадмап', 'roadmap', 'фичи документация', 'product docs', 'требования к продукту', 'документация продукта'.

AI & Automation 5 stars 0 forks Updated yesterday MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 83/100

Stars 20%
26
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
80
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Docs Product — product documentation («why» & «what») Use this skill to write the **product-facing** documents: vision, requirements, roadmap, feature catalog. Written from an idea forward — **before** (or in parallel with) engineering docs. ## When to use - A project needs its product docs: VISION, PRD, ROADMAP, FEATURES. - User asks for "продуктовая документация", "vision", "prd", "роадмап", "требования к продукту", "product requirements". - Requirements must become the input for engineering docs. ## Do NOT use - For engineering docs (architecture, ADR, tests, dev guide, map) — that is `docs-project`. - For the meta-guide (phases, levels L1/L2/L3, completeness checklist) — `docs-system`. ## Which docs belong here | File | Purpose | When | Template | |------|---------|:----:|----------| | `docs/VISION.md` | Why the product exists: audience, problem, value, principles, scope, long-term success | Phase 1 — first, stays stable | `templates/VISION.tmpl` | | `docs/PRD.md` | What we build: functional + non-functional requirements, priorities, acceptance criteria, success metrics, user stories | After VISION, before architecture | `templates/PRD.tmpl` | | `docs/ROADMAP.md` | What ships when: milestones, value per milestone, proof (metrics) | Phase 2+, updated each milestone | `templates/ROADMAP.tmpl` | | `docs/FEATURES.md` | Feature catalog + status (✅/📋) — the bridge to engineering | From requirements, kept current | `templates/FEATURES.tmpl` | The golden chain: **VIS...

Details

Author
bestdeejay-design
Repository
bestdeejay-design/agent-skills
Created
1 weeks ago
Last Updated
yesterday
Language
Python
License
MIT

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Solid

docs-project

Project (engineering) documentation branch — the 'how': README, ENTRY, AGENT/DELIVERY runbooks, and docs/ (REFERENCE map, ARCHITECTURE, ADR, SAGA, TEST_CASES, DEV_GUIDE, IMPROVEMENTS, TROUBLESHOOTING, BACKLOG, REVIEW, STATUS) plus contracts/ (OpenAPI/AsyncAPI — machine truth written BEFORE code). The map rule: every doc gets a card in REFERENCE.md. Full catalog + checklist in references/project-docs.md. Triggers: 'проектная документация', 'архитектура документация', 'adr', 'engineering docs', 'документация разработчика', 'контракты openapi', 'project docs', 'инженерная документация'.

5 Updated yesterday
bestdeejay-design
AI & Automation Solid

docs-system

Meta-guide + router for documentation: the two branches (docs-product for 'why/what', docs-project for 'how'), the phase order, completeness levels L1/L2/L3, and the completeness checklist. Load a branch directly when the task is clearly product or engineering; load this skill for the big picture, ordering and completeness gates. Triggers: 'документация', 'набор документации', 'каталог документов', 'документация структура', 'полная документация', 'docs catalog', 'documentation structure', 'какую документацию писать'.

5 Updated yesterday
bestdeejay-design
Data & Documents Listed

product

Use when the user wants a product strategy doc, PRD, pitch, vision, personas, or outcomes at docs/product/product.md. Drafts or re-authors the document. Triggers on "write the PRD", "draft a product pitch", "who are our personas". Re-authoring is also how an existing product.md gets critiqued or revised — docs-review checks writing quality and cross-document consistency, not strategic soundness. Do NOT use for phased delivery plan (roadmap), epics or backlog (tasks), architecture (solution), tasks or Gherkin (tasks), or implementation (implement).

2 Updated yesterday
carinyaparc