anti-ceremony

Featured

Guard outcome work against process overhead. Triggers: RPI pre-Plan guard; explicit "full anti-ceremony audit" requests.

AI & Automation 427 stars 40 forks Updated today Apache-2.0

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 97/100

Stars 20%
88
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Anti-Ceremony Keep work tied to the caller-visible outcome and the proof still needed for it. The default guard is a single, artifact-free judgment before RPI Plan. ## Modes | Trigger | Mode | |---|---| | RPI pre-Plan invocation or ordinary use | Quick guard | | Explicit request for a full anti-ceremony audit | Full honesty audit | Never promote the quick guard into the full audit without the explicit trigger. ## Quick guard 1. Freeze the caller-visible outcome in one short statement. 2. Park proposed process work that has no concrete consumer, gated subject or release decision, observed defect, or retirement condition. 3. Name the implementation or independent proof still missing. 4. Name the condition that ends this traversal. 5. Return `STOP` when the traversal would only create control artifacts or the frozen outcome is already sufficiently proved; otherwise return `CONTINUE`. Perform the guard exactly once in memory. Write no worksheet, ledger, capture, dashboard, prompt packet, or other hidden artifact. Parking is a field in the response, not a tracker or delivery mutation. Return this shape: ```yaml decision: CONTINUE | STOP reason: <exactly one sentence> frozen_outcome: <nonempty string> parked_process_work: [<work item>, ...] remaining_proof: [<proof item>, ...] stop_condition: <nonempty string> ``` The two lists contain strings and may be empty. Done when every field is present and the decision explains whether one RPI traversal earns its cost. ##...

Details

Author
boshu2
Repository
boshu2/agentops
Created
9 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
Go
License
Apache-2.0

Bundled in these plugins

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category