plan

Featured

Define intended behavior, review write scope and assess reversible decisions. Use when: acceptance or approach is unclear before coding; stop once actionable.

AI & Automation 434 stars 40 forks Updated today Apache-2.0

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 97/100

Stars 20%
88
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Plan Shape only missing intent. Prefer the caller's tracker, if any; otherwise use the conversation or supplied text. Planning produces no AgentOps packet. A clear change can proceed directly. Use established domain names throughout intent, examples, code and validation; [Domain](../domain/SKILL.md) helps when meanings or boundaries are genuinely unclear. ## Workflow 1. Read accepted intent and relevant source owners and active constraints. Resolve only consequential uncertainty; do not reopen settled decisions without new evidence. Identify the caller-visible outcome, scope and first useful check. 2. Describe the intended observable behavior before implementation. Reuse acceptance already supplied in the conversation or bead; clarify only what prevents action or judgment. Name the actor or caller, the event and the observable result. One example often suffices; use Given/When/Then for branching behavior and consequential boundaries. Include non-goals only where they prevent a plausible scope mistake in that existing source. Scope includes the hand-edited owners, affected tests/live consumers and generator-owned companions as a class; it is authority, not a predicted file count. A consequential assumption deserves an early discriminating check, not a general checklist or exhaustive survey. 3. Choose the smallest action that advances acceptance or falsifies the risky assumption. Include recapture of affected bound evidence where nece...

Details

Author
boshu2
Repository
boshu2/agentops
Created
10 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
Go
License
Apache-2.0

Bundled in these plugins

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category