review

Featured

Use when asked to review a codebase or a change, or when the /review command runs — assess design, correctness, maintainability, and test coverage with actionable feedback.

Code & Development 2,222 stars 97 forks Updated today MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 91/100

Stars 20%
100
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
54
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Code Review Review the current project or the most recent change set and give feedback the author can act on. ## Procedure 1. Determine the review target: the whole project, the current branch diff (git diff against the base), or a specific area the user names. 2. Read the code with these lenses: - **设计**: does the structure match the problem? Clear ownership, sane seams, no over-engineering? - **正确性**: boundary conditions, error handling, concurrency, resource lifetime. - **可维护性**: naming, duplication, dead code, complexity hotspots, comment quality. - **测试**: are the important behaviors covered? Are tests asserting behavior rather than implementation? 3. For each finding: file/line, what's wrong, why it matters, concrete suggestion. 4. Order feedback: blocking issues first, then nits. Distinguish "must fix" from "consider". 5. End with what's good — reviews that only criticize are less useful. ## Constraints - Do not modify code during the review. - If reviewing a diff, look at the diff in context (surrounding code), not just the changed lines.

Details

Author
ccch1mneyyy
Repository
ccch1mneyyy/dsh-TUI
Created
1 weeks ago
Last Updated
today
Language
TypeScript
License
MIT

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category