deliberation

Solid

Multi-perspective synthesis structure — Innovator (propose) → Devil-Advocate (challenge) → Mediator (synthesize) 3-layer execution. Outputs conditional verdicts without binary win/loss. Activates on "deliberation", "battle this out", "weigh the pros and cons", "review from multiple angles", "which side is right?". Optional deep-insight persona jurors for domain-specific views. Designed for design decisions, skill proposals, and architectural choices.

AI & Automation 16 stars 1 forks Updated today MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 83/100

Stars 20%
41
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# deliberation — The Forge Skill Innovator (propose) → Devil (challenge) → Mediator (synthesize) 3-layer core structure. The goal is not to pick a winner — it is to **extract salvageable fragments from the losing argument and produce a conditional verdict**. Even those who struggle to challenge assumptions can use this structure as a rope to reach better decisions. > **Role distinction from sim-conductor and steel-quench** > - sim-conductor: **validates** quality and consistency of a completed asset > - steel-quench: **adversarially stress-tests** a near-complete artifact (post-build defect surfacing) > - deliberation: perspective clash during the **design decision process** → synthesis (upstream of both) --- ## Triggers - `/deliberation` - "battle this out", "make them argue", "clash and synthesize" - "review this decision from multiple angles" - When agent-composer Step 4-b proposes `Wave next-D` automatically ### Natural Language Triggers (for general users — activates without internal vocabulary) Also activates when design decisions or perspective clashes are expressed in natural language: | Example phrase | Intent | |---|---| | "I'm not sure whether to do this or not" | Decision uncertainty → multi-perspective synthesis | | "It seems like opinions are divided" | Perspective clash → synthesis layer needed | | "Help me decide which side is right" | Conditional synthesis, not simple winner selection | | "Someone will probably object to this" | Request for devil's ad...

Details

Author
chrono-meta
Repository
chrono-meta/forge-harness
Created
4 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
Shell
License
MIT

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Listed

deliberate

Use when about to throw a substantive decision back at the user as a multiple-choice question, when the user has explicitly delegated the choice ("you decide", "you pick", "i aint picking", "stop asking me to choose", "just do it"), when a craft / strategy / architecture / design / project decision involves competing pressures requiring synthesis, or any time multiple equally-defensible paths exist and the right answer requires deliberation rather than information retrieval. Three-agent sequential loop (Opinion-Drafter → Goal-Auditor → Impact-Maximizer) iterates until convergence, then issues a single recommendation. Skip for trivial mechanical tasks (file ops, format conversions, single-fact lookups, information requests). Auto-fires before any clarifying question that asks the user to pick between substantive options.

1 Updated 1 months ago
LuciferDono
AI & Automation Listed

deliberation

Use BEFORE brainstorming when facing a complex architectural, technology, or design decision where the options are not yet well-defined or the problem itself may need reframing. Assembles named stakeholder perspectives that each speak once without debate, then surfaces where they converge and where real tension remains — without forcing a premature choice. Triggers on: "should we use X or Y", "not sure which approach", "evaluate these options", "what are the trade-offs between", "help me think through this decision", "architecture decision", "technology choice". Routed by using-superpowers before brainstorming when the decision space is unclear.

3 Updated 2 days ago
brunob54
AI & Automation Listed

dialectic-brainstorming

Brainstorm a consequential, no-ground-truth question with a panel of diverse minds, then resolve it dialectically. A casting step derives orthogonal thinking-axes for the question (each a quality to maximize) and casts one persona per axis; the personas propose and cross-critique concrete candidates while a neutral Synthesizer prunes, recombines across axes, and holds a frontier — returning a short list, not one winner. Use for naming (products, tools, projects), positioning, or any choice of consequence with no objectively correct answer where you want many genuinely different perspectives, not one. Triggers: /dialectic-brainstorming, "brainstorm this with a diverse panel", "what should we name…", "give me a shortlist from multiple perspectives".

0 Updated 2 days ago
mehdiforoozandeh