deliberation
SolidMulti-perspective synthesis structure — Innovator (propose) → Devil-Advocate (challenge) → Mediator (synthesize) 3-layer execution. Outputs conditional verdicts without binary win/loss. Activates on "deliberation", "battle this out", "weigh the pros and cons", "review from multiple angles", "which side is right?". Optional deep-insight persona jurors for domain-specific views. Designed for design decisions, skill proposals, and architectural choices.
Install
Quality Score: 83/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- chrono-meta
- Repository
- chrono-meta/forge-harness
- Created
- 4 months ago
- Last Updated
- today
- Language
- Shell
- License
- MIT
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
deliberate
Use when about to throw a substantive decision back at the user as a multiple-choice question, when the user has explicitly delegated the choice ("you decide", "you pick", "i aint picking", "stop asking me to choose", "just do it"), when a craft / strategy / architecture / design / project decision involves competing pressures requiring synthesis, or any time multiple equally-defensible paths exist and the right answer requires deliberation rather than information retrieval. Three-agent sequential loop (Opinion-Drafter → Goal-Auditor → Impact-Maximizer) iterates until convergence, then issues a single recommendation. Skip for trivial mechanical tasks (file ops, format conversions, single-fact lookups, information requests). Auto-fires before any clarifying question that asks the user to pick between substantive options.
deliberation
Use BEFORE brainstorming when facing a complex architectural, technology, or design decision where the options are not yet well-defined or the problem itself may need reframing. Assembles named stakeholder perspectives that each speak once without debate, then surfaces where they converge and where real tension remains — without forcing a premature choice. Triggers on: "should we use X or Y", "not sure which approach", "evaluate these options", "what are the trade-offs between", "help me think through this decision", "architecture decision", "technology choice". Routed by using-superpowers before brainstorming when the decision space is unclear.
dialectic-brainstorming
Brainstorm a consequential, no-ground-truth question with a panel of diverse minds, then resolve it dialectically. A casting step derives orthogonal thinking-axes for the question (each a quality to maximize) and casts one persona per axis; the personas propose and cross-critique concrete candidates while a neutral Synthesizer prunes, recombines across axes, and holds a frontier — returning a short list, not one winner. Use for naming (products, tools, projects), positioning, or any choice of consequence with no objectively correct answer where you want many genuinely different perspectives, not one. Triggers: /dialectic-brainstorming, "brainstorm this with a diverse panel", "what should we name…", "give me a shortlist from multiple perspectives".