review-work
SolidPost-implementation gate review: run manual QA on the real surface yourself, then launch ONE gate reviewer (never a panel) to audit goal, constraints, code quality, security, missed context, and QA evidence. Use before a PR handoff or when the user explicitly asks to review completed work.
Install
Quality Score: 83/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- code-yeongyu
- Repository
- code-yeongyu/oh-my-openagent
- Created
- 9 months ago
- Last Updated
- yesterday
- Language
- TypeScript
- License
- NOASSERTION
Integrates with
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
ulw-research
Maximum-saturation research orchestration: parallel explore+librarian swarms across codebase, web, official docs, and OSS repos; a recursive EXPAND loop driven by leads workers return in message text; empirical verification by running code; cited synthesis and optional MD/HTML/PDF/PPTX reports. ACTIVATES ONLY on an explicit user demand for research — the word 'ulw-research' ('/ulw-research', '$ulw-research'), any 'ulw' research wording, or an explicit request for research / deep research / an ultra-precise investigation, in any language. Never self-activates for ordinary questions, debugging, or implementation context-gathering. While active it overrides exploration-bounding defaults: exhaustive coverage is the goal.
codex
Use when the user asks to run Codex CLI (codex exec, codex resume) or references OpenAI Codex for code analysis, refactoring, or automated editing
codex-review
Codex review lifecycle - build the review bundle, generate the prompt, parse APPROVED/CHANGES_REQUIRED results, run the review-fix loop, and invalidate approval via the implementation fingerprint.