senpi-qa
SolidQA the omo Senpi adapter (packages/omo-senpi, packages/senpi-task) against the REAL senpi binary in strict isolation, and write every artifact to the one canonical evidence path .omo/evidence/omo-senpi-adapter/<slug>/. The live drivers under packages/omo-senpi/scripts/qa/ create their own isolated SENPI_CODING_AGENT_DIR and ignore the caller's, so the real ~/.senpi/agent is never written. Ships scripts/resolve-evidence-dir.mjs, which is the ONLY sanctioned way to pick an evidence directory: it rejects traversal, separators, absolute paths, and stray roots such as local-ignore/qa-evidence. Use whenever someone changes anything under packages/omo-senpi or packages/senpi-task, or wants to QA, smoke-test, verify, or debug the Senpi adapter, the task/team engine, the DAG, task RPC, or skill delivery. Triggers: senpi qa, qa senpi, senpi-qa, test senpi adapter, verify senpi task, senpi task e2e, senpi team e2e, task dag qa, live senpi driver, senpi evidence path.
Install
Quality Score: 83/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- code-yeongyu
- Repository
- code-yeongyu/oh-my-openagent
- Created
- 9 months ago
- Last Updated
- today
- Language
- TypeScript
- License
- NOASSERTION
Integrates with
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
ai-agents-validation-and-qa
What counts as evidence in ai-agents and how to produce it. Covers the TESTING-RIGOR pos+neg+edge bar, test layout and collection reality, coverage proof commands, runtime-contract tests with negative controls, and ADR-034 QA skip semantics at session end. Use when you say `what counts as evidence`, `how do I test this change`, `run skill tests`, `can I skip QA`. Do NOT use for CI failure triage (use `ai-agents-debugging-playbook`) or measurement tooling (use `ai-agents-diagnostics-toolkit`).
qa-gate
Execute the self-contained final QA gate as a Spec's authored terminal `qa` Task — derive a resumable QA matrix from the PRD and task evidence, execute real user flows through every declared surface, probe high-risk user behavior, capture auditable evidence, classify findings by user impact, and write the spec-local dated QA report. Do not use as a substitute for implementation tests or a broad standalone QA knowledge base.
qa
Browser evidence route when UI changed, browser acceptance remains unproven, or the user asks to test a page. Requires host browser automation; maps the current artifact to acceptance criteria and stores a PR-ready handoff for `ship`. Use `review` for the diff and native tests for non-UI behavior.