figure-review

## Colorblind reference ```! D="${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:+$CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT/skills/figure-review}"; D="${D:-$HOME/.claude/skills/figure-review}"; cat "$D/COLORBLIND.md" 2>/dev/null || echo "(colorblind guide not found)" ``` ## House style ```! D="${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:+$CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT/skills/figure-review}"; D="${D:-$HOME/.claude/skills/figure-review}"; cat "$D/CC-STYLE.md" 2>/dev/null || echo "(no house style configured — criterion 6 skipped)" ``` ## Inputs Accept any subset of: figure image, plotting code, caption, surrounding text claim. Mark `cant-assess` for any criterion that requires input not provided. ## Scope — establish this before applying any criterion Determine each of the following from the inputs. **Standalone figure, or one panel of a composite?** Look for siblings before deciding — list the directory, and if plotting code is an input, check whether one script saves several panels. Signals: a panel-style filename (`fig2C.pdf`, `Fig_3B.pdf`); a sibling differing by one letter. A panel delegates its **legend and symbol definitions** to the composite; do not flag those. It does **not** reliably delegate **n or data source** — a composite caption routinely covers several panels without mapping which is which — so keep checking them. When the composite is not itself an input, mark delegated items `cant-assess`; never pass them silently. **Draft, or published?** Published means post-peer-review: apparent defects are far more likely to be considered choice...