review-prs-cx

Solid

Analyze open Pull Requests from the project's GitHub repository, generate a critical report, and optionally implement approved changes

AI & Automation 6,067 stars 1058 forks Updated today MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 93/100

Stars 20%
100
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# /review-prs — PR Review & Analysis Workflow ## ⛔ ABSOLUTE PROHIBITION — Read Before Anything Else > **NEVER close a contributor's PR if you intend to use ANY of their code, ideas, or fixes.** > > **NEVER manually integrate contributor code into a release branch and then close their PR.** > > These actions are **STRICTLY FORBIDDEN** under all circumstances: > > 1. ❌ Closing a PR and cherry-picking/copying its code into a release branch > 2. ❌ Closing a PR "because of conflicts" and re-implementing the same fix yourself > 3. ❌ Closing a PR and committing a "similar" solution inspired by it > 4. ❌ Using `gh pr close` on any PR whose content was or will be used > > **Why**: Closing a PR after taking the contributor's work means they get ZERO credit on GitHub — no "Merged" badge, no contribution graph entry, no public record. This is effectively stealing their contribution. An audit found this happened to **37 PRs** in the past. > > **The ONLY acceptable flow**: Resolve conflicts IN the contributor's branch, push fixes TO their branch, then merge THEIR PR via `gh pr merge`. See Step 7 and Step 8 for the exact procedure. > > **When to close a PR**: ONLY when the user (repository owner) explicitly requests it, OR when the PR is clearly spam/malicious, OR when the author themselves asks to close it. In ALL other cases, leave it open. ## Overview This workflow fetches all open PRs from the project's GitHub repository, performs a critical analysis of each one, generates a detaile...

Details

Author
diegosouzapw
Repository
diegosouzapw/OmniRoute
Created
3 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
TypeScript
License
MIT

Integrates with

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category