review
SolidCloseout pass on a finished substantive change — sequence refactor-clean (shape), code-review (diff), and write-docs (docs) so all three run, in the order where each feeds the next. Use after implementing a slice or feature and before calling it done or committing; when the user asks for a final review, a cleanup-and-document pass, or to "review everything." For a diff-only audit, reach code-review directly.
Install
Quality Score: 82/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- dzhng
- Repository
- dzhng/duet-agent
- Created
- 5 months ago
- Last Updated
- 2 days ago
- Language
- TypeScript
- License
- Apache-2.0
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
code-review
Reviewing a change as an engineering activity: setting review depth from the change's risk rather than its size, looking in the order that finds the expensive defects first, refusing to spend human attention on what a formatter or linter should own, writing a finding that can be acted on, separating blocking objections from preferences, and receiving review without either capitulating or defending. Use when reviewing a pull request or a diff, when a review has become a list of style comments, when reviews are slow or rubber-stamped, when a reviewer and an author are deadlocked, when a defect reached production through an approved change, or when deciding what a review must catch versus what CI should. Does not cover the smell catalogue (java-code-smells), SOLID as review criteria (java-solid), readability heuristics (java-clean-code), or which automated gates to run (quality-gates).
closeout-review
Run the final scope-controlled review before committing, pushing, or opening a PR. Use for closeout review, readiness checks, or self-review of a completed branch.
review
Review a code diff when asked, before committing, or before a PR. Uses scoped evidence, risk lanes, bounded correction, and cold-context escalation. NOT browser QA, prepared-plan critique, or external artifact trust checks.