bug-hunt
SolidUse when asked to find bugs, hunt for correctness issues, sweep a codebase for defects, or verify a repo behaves as intended. Not for style or architecture review; this is defect-finding only.
Install
Quality Score: 83/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- escoffier-labs
- Repository
- escoffier-labs/brigade
- Created
- 2 months ago
- Last Updated
- 1 weeks ago
- Language
- Python
- License
- MIT
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
bug-hunt
Use when asked to find bugs, hunt for correctness issues, sweep a codebase for defects, or verify a repo behaves as intended. Not for style or architecture review; this is defect-finding only.
hunt
Systematic bug hunting across a full-stack TypeScript application. Finds semantic bugs, async issues, data integrity problems, security vulnerabilities, performance hotspots, and UI/browser issues — producing a prioritized report with evidence and fix suggestions. Use when the user says /hunt, asks to "find bugs", "audit this", "check for issues", "scan for problems", wants a code review focused on correctness rather than style, mentions specific concerns like "are there race conditions", "check for security issues", "find performance problems", or wants to validate code quality before a release. Also triggers on "what's wrong with this", "anything broken", "smell check", or any request to systematically find problems in code.
bug-hunt
Runs a disciplined adversarial bug hunt over the footbag-platform repository across five defect layers - design/specification, implementation (security/correctness), verification gaps, documentation drift (the full doc-sync audit), and Claude Code harness bugs. Orchestrates read-only in plan mode in the MAIN session, dispatches lanes to read-only subagents, verifies every candidate, and writes findings to BUGS.md only after plan approval; remediation happens in later sessions. Invoke ONLY when the user explicitly asks for a "bug hunt", "bug sweep", "design bug hunt", "extended doc sync", or "full doc-sync audit" by name. Do NOT infer it from "adversarial review", "security pass", "review the code/design/docs", or plain "doc sync". Not a testing strategy and not browser QA.