multi-perspective

# Multi-Perspective Exploration Spawn 3-5 parallel agents, each with a distinct disciplinary lens and epistemic prior, to independently investigate a research question. Then synthesise their findings into a structured comparison that surfaces agreements, tensions, and blind spots. The core insight: a single-perspective analysis inherits the biases of that perspective. Deliberately introducing cognitive diversity — grounded in real disciplinary traditions — produces more robust research designs. ## Output Path Per `rules/review-artefact-routing.md` (auto-loads in research projects (path-scoped to `paper-*/` and `paper/`)): - **Source slug:** `multi-perspective` - **Write reports to:** `reviews/<scope>/multi-perspective/YYYY-MM-DD-HHMM.md` inside the project, where `<scope>` is the paper slug (e.g., `paper-jtp`, `paper-philtech`) for paper-level reviews or `_project` for project-level reviews. Path is relative to the research project root, not the Task-Management repo. - **Never** at project root (`./CRITIC-REPORT.md`-style filenames are forbidden — pre-rule layout). - **Idempotency:** the timestamp includes minutes (`YYYY-MM-DD-HHMM`), so same-day runs are naturally separated. If multiple reports are generated in the same minute, append a descriptor (`{timestamp}-r2.md`, `{timestamp}-revision.md`) — never overwrite. - **Index update:** if `reviews/INDEX.md` exists, write a one-line entry under "Latest per source" pointing at the new file. Otherwise `review-recap` will reb...