agent-evaluation
SolidEvaluate stochastic LLM/RAG/model/retrieval/tool agents in trials. Compare baseline/candidate on development/sealed holdouts with calibrated deterministic/model/trace graders; measure reliability, variance, leakage, safety, and cost.
Install
Quality Score: 80/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- fmind
- Repository
- fmind/dotfiles
- Created
- 4 months ago
- Last Updated
- yesterday
- Language
- Go
- License
- MIT
Integrates with
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
agent-evaluation
Designs and runs reproducible evaluations for AI agents, prompts, tools, skills, and model-backed workflows using realistic datasets, isolated baselines, objective assertions, rubric grading, trajectory analysis, cost/latency tracking, and regression comparison. Use when measuring agent quality, optimizing skill triggering, comparing prompts or models, or gating an AI feature release. Not for ordinary deterministic unit tests.
agent-evaluation
Design reproducible evaluations for AI agents with representative task sets, explicit rubrics, appropriate graders, baselines, regression gates, and failure analysis. Use when defining agent quality, comparing prompts or models, validating a release, measuring tool-use reliability, investigating regressions, or deciding whether an agent is ready for production.
agent-evaluation
Evaluate LLM agents and tool-using workflows—task success, tool accuracy, latency/cost, safety, and regression suites. Use when shipping agent features, comparing prompts/models, or debugging agent failures.