flow-next-qa

Featured

Live-app QA pass derived from the spec. Drives the running app, files P0/P1/P2 findings with evidence, emits a YES or NO qa_verdict receipt.

AI & Automation 695 stars 55 forks Updated today MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 95/100

Stars 20%
95
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# /flow-next:qa — live-app real-user QA pass flow-next's review surface today is all static: `impl-review`, `spec-completion-review`, `quality-auditor`, `code-review`. Nothing drives the *running* app like an unforgiving real user. `/flow-next:qa` fills that gap — it drives the deployed app (via **fn-51 flow-next-drive**), files structured P0/P1/P2 findings with evidence, and ends with a YES/NO ship verdict emitted as a proof-of-work receipt. **Augments, never replaces.** QA is the cheap *first* live pass — the app already runs on the dev's machine during `work`, so run an initial agentic pass over the complete build before a human opens the PR. Like everything in flow-next it **reduces human work agentically and surfaces problems to humans**; it does **not** stand in for CI/staging QA or manual QA, which still happen downstream. Findings are advisory: they ride the draft PR + the bug-memory track, and the human reviewer + the land gate decide. **Two entry points, one skill.** Run it user-invoked (you remember to), or wire it into the autonomous build loop as the **optional `pipeline.qa` pilot stage** (default **off**; `flowctl config set pipeline.qa on`). When on, [`/flow-next:pilot`](../flow-next-pilot/SKILL.md) inserts a `qa` stage at the **all-tasks-done** juncture — one live pass over the complete build, just before make-pr (`plan → plan-review → work → qa → make-pr`). The stage is evidence-aware (it leans on what `work` already verified) and autonomy-safe (`SHIP`/`NA...

Details

Author
gmickel
Repository
gmickel/flow-next
Created
8 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
Python
License
MIT

Integrates with

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

Testing & QA Listed

qa

Exercise a developed feature through its real user or consumer interface, enumerate paths and edge/error/loading states first, and report evidence and coverage. Use for "qa", "QA the last feature", "test this feature end to end", "manual QA", or "check the user flows". Defaults to the last developed feature; accepts a feature, URL, command, app, or other scope. Covers web, native apps, CLIs, agent plugins, libraries, and backends. Use test for suite work and code-review for source review.

0 Updated today
nielsmadan
AI & Automation Listed

initiate-qa

Run exactly ONE bounded cycle of the persistent QA verification lane — sweep the qa queue + context stream, atomically claim one review-status card, verify it from INDEPENDENT evidence via a matched verifier persona, verdict PASS→done / FAIL→back to the acting lane, then record and heartbeat. QA is the only lane that moves review→done. Use when the user says "initiate QA", "run a qa cycle", "/initiate-qa", or the qa lane runner fires this as its headless cycle prompt.

4 Updated 1 months ago
Eastkap
Testing & QA Listed

app-qa

Visually verify treq UI/behavior changes by driving the real app (real jj repo via NAPI, real Rust dispatch, jsdom-rendered React) with @testing-library/user-event and capturing before/after screenshots through the Chromium rasterization harness in scripts/screenshot/. Use explicitly when the user runs /app-qa or asks to screenshot, QA, or visually check a behavior. ALSO use proactively, without being asked, right after implementing or modifying anything that changes rendered UI or user-facing interaction: components under src/components/**, hooks under src/hooks/**, src/lib/** helpers that affect rendering, or Tauri commands under src-tauri/src/commands/** and src-tauri/src/core/** that back a UI flow. Do this before telling the user the change is done. A PostToolUse hook (.claude/hooks/post-edit-app-qa.sh) injects a reminder for exactly this case — treat that reminder as the trigger to run this skill, not just a suggestion.

4 Updated today
treq-dev