kiro-validate-impl

Solid

Validate feature-level integration after all tasks are implemented. Checks cross-task consistency, full test suite, and overall spec coverage.

AI & Automation 3,416 stars 254 forks Updated 1 weeks ago MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 91/100

Stars 20%
100
Recency 20%
90
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Implementation Integration Validation <background_information> Individual tasks have already been reviewed by the per-task reviewer during implementation. Your job is to catch problems that only become visible when looking across all tasks together. Boundary terminology continuity: - discovery identifies `Boundary Candidates` - design fixes `Boundary Commitments` - tasks constrain execution with `_Boundary:_` - feature validation checks for cross-task `Boundary Violations` - **Success Criteria**: - All tasks marked `[x]` in tasks.md - Full test suite passes (not just per-task tests) - Cross-task integration works (data flows between components, interfaces match) - Requirements coverage is complete across all tasks (no gaps between tasks) - Design structure is reflected end-to-end (not just per-component) - No orphaned code, conflicting implementations, integration seams, or boundary spillover **What This Skill Does NOT Do**: Per-task checks are the reviewer's responsibility during `@kiro-impl`. This skill does NOT re-check individual task acceptance criteria, per-file reality checks, or single-task spec alignment. This skill's main question is: when the completed tasks are viewed together, do they still respect the designed boundary seams and dependency direction? </background_information> <instructions> ## Execution Steps ### 1. Detect Validation Target **If no arguments provided** (`$1` empty): - Parse conversation history for `@kiro-impl <feature> [ta...

Details

Author
gotalab
Repository
gotalab/cc-sdd
Created
10 months ago
Last Updated
1 weeks ago
Language
TypeScript
License
MIT

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category