engineering-wisdom
FeaturedProvide an explicitly requested, repository-grounded engineering review using contextual heuristics for code clarity, SOLID and design, testing, refactoring, architecture, and professional practice. Use only when the user invokes `$engineering-wisdom` or explicitly asks for this installed engineering-wisdom pack; do not turn its advice into repository policy or automatically rewrite an application architecture.
Install
Quality Score: 88/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- hoangnb24
- Repository
- hoangnb24/repository-harness
- Created
- 4 months ago
- Last Updated
- 1 months ago
- Language
- Rust
- License
- MIT
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
engineering-excellence
Audits code for KISS, YAGNI, DRY, SOLID, and testability; maintains living engineering notes under .heyeddi/docs/engineering/. Use when refactoring, before merge, or when the user asks for simple scalable design, architecture notes, reuse catalog, or engineering ADRs — not for visual UX (use ux-flow-auditor) or CI gates (use pre-merge-gate).
engineering-standards
Code-shape policy for ALL code that gets written or reviewed — the senior-engineer bar for minimal complexity. Use whenever you are about to write code, design a module or abstraction, draft a plan phase that shapes code, or review a diff; also when the user asks "is this over-engineered", "can this be simpler", or pushes back on complexity. Sibling of desplega:delegate-work (which picks WHO executes; this skill defines WHAT good output looks like).
michel-packmind-engineer-review
Review an implemented GitHub issue the way a senior Packmind engineer would — the human-judgment checks that ESLint, the TypeScript compiler, and e2e tests cannot catch (authorization scoping, hexagonal-architecture conformance, analytics-event wiring, UX copy, UI reactivity, CLI behavior, multi-tenancy safety, and more). Use this skill once an issue has been implemented and you have a diff to inspect — before opening or merging the PR. Trigger on 'review this implementation', 'engineer review', 'packmind review', 'QC this issue', 'is this issue done well', 'review issue #NNN', or any post-implementation quality gate. Reach for it even when the user just says the work is done and asks 'anything I missed?' — automated checks already ran; this is the layer they don't cover.