write-phase-plan

Solid

Writes or restructures an implementation plan in the format the phase-orchestrator skill consumes: dependency-ordered phases with explicit scope, acceptance criteria, validation commands, and status/log conventions. Use when the user asks to write a plan for phase orchestration, prepare a plan or PRD for delegated multi-agent implementation, or convert a spec, checklist, or design doc into implementable phases.

Data & Documents 13 stars 1 forks Updated 2 weeks ago MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 83/100

Stars 20%
38
Recency 20%
90
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
80
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Write Phase Plan ## Goal Produce a plan document that a phase-orchestrator run can execute without re-deriving structure. Each phase must be implementable by a worker that has no chat history: the phase section is the worker's entire brief, plus repo rules and the code itself. The plan is the source of truth during the run. The orchestrator updates phase status and appends log entries as it goes, so the document must be written to absorb that. ## Where The Plan Lives Follow the repo's convention for design docs (for example `plans/<author>/` in repos that define one). One markdown file per plan. Link out to the PRD/spec rather than duplicating it. ## Document Structure ```markdown # <Feature name> ## Overview One or two paragraphs: what is being built and why. Link the PRD/spec. ## Constraints Repo-wide facts every phase needs: commit/PR policy, validation commands, branch or worktree requirements, anything the orchestrator must not infer. ## Phases A short table or list: phase ID, name, depends-on, parallelizable-with. ## Phase 1: <name> - **Status:** Not started - **Depends on:** none | Phase N - **Objective:** one sentence, the outcome not the activity. - **Scope:** the files/modules this phase owns (its write scope). - **Out of scope:** adjacent work this phase must not touch. - **Approach:** implementation notes — key decisions already made, pointers to the code the worker should read first, known landmines. - **Acceptance criteria:** checkable statements ...

Details

Author
hraness
Repository
hraness/wordcell
Created
2 months ago
Last Updated
2 weeks ago
Language
TypeScript
License
MIT

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category