ideate
SolidDivergent candidate-field generation before any selection is made. When the object-level candidate field is empty or has prematurely converged, infers seed vs. blank entry from the invocation utterance alone — zero entry questions. A blank entry opens an abstract frame map for user selection before any concrete idea is shown, mitigating early-example fixation and preserving ownership; a seeded entry expands directly from the user's own fragments. Generates candidates in parallel across open frames with no elimination, ranking, or scoring — every candidate carries origin User or AI. The user's own stop is the constitutive act that bounds the field, available at any time; a stop before any candidate exists returns a typed withdrawal, never a mislabeled empty field. A wish to go deeper on an already-open frame parks as a typed follow-up for later chaining — the live loop only widens — and the assembled field is an endpoint-neutral contract (topic, tagged candidates, explored/unexplored frames, parked follow-ups,
Install
Quality Score: 84/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- jongwony
- Repository
- jongwony/epistemic-protocols
- Created
- 8 months ago
- Last Updated
- today
- Language
- JavaScript
- License
- MIT
Bundled in these plugins
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
diverge
Structured divergence engine for consequential, open-ended decisions. Generates a wide, deliberately non-anchored option space by spawning isolated parallel sub-agents under different cognitive frames, then runs a separate critic pass that scores, declusters, and deepens the best. The divergent complement to /deep-analysis. Warranted only when a decision is both hard to reverse or wide in blast radius AND genuinely open with several structurally different answers — architecture and platform strategy, design-space exploration, de-anchoring a premature conclusion, or a high-stakes what are our options. Triggers include diverge, brainstorm options, explore alternatives, option space, divergent thinking. Because it fans out many agents in parallel it is not for cheap or adjacent asks — naming, wording, picking between two known libraries, or any question with one defensible answer should be answered directly.
ideate
Structured idea generation for a project or a blank-slate problem — ideas worth pursuing, not the first one that sticks. Grounds in the current repo (AGENTS.md/README) or a freeform problem, then diverges across named lenses (adjacent user, removed constraint, inversion, and more) so a run yields range, not ten variations of one idea. Fights premature convergence — nothing judged until the divergence quota is met — then verdicts each idea EXPLORE/PARK/DROP, where DROP is cheap. EXPLORE items become seeds for priorart (is it novel?) or feature (build it); verdicts persist in out/ideate/tracker.md so repeat runs open with what's new. Keyless. Use to generate, brainstorm, or explore ideas or new directions for a project or problem — e.g. "/ideate", "/ideate <topic>", "brainstorm features for X". For whether an idea already exists use priorart; for competitor features use scout; for choosing between named options use verdict.
diverge
Before implementing, generate 3-5 conceptually distinct approaches labeled by creativity dimension (Novel, Surprising, Diverse, Conventional), then hold for selection. Brainstorm-then-select to resist defaulting to the most obvious solution.