lens-review
SolidOne-pass multi-perspective PR review that posts findings as a single consolidated PR comment. /frame derives the review lenses that fit the diff, plus a gap scan, over only the files changed in a PR; each lens analyzes in isolation, then the findings are adversarially cross-verified before the survivors are posted. Composes prothesis:frame and syneidesis:gap. User-invoked via /lens-review.
Install
Quality Score: 84/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- jongwony
- Repository
- jongwony/epistemic-protocols
- Created
- 7 months ago
- Last Updated
- today
- Language
- JavaScript
- License
- MIT
Bundled in these plugins
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
formal-review
This skill should be used when the user asks to "formal review", "formal lens review", or invokes /formal-review. A fixed-lens PR review for this repository's formally-structured protocol changes: it pins a Category Theory / Type Theory / Operational Semantics lens panel plus a gap scan over only the files changed in a PR, analyzes each lens in isolation, adversarially cross-verifies the findings, and posts the survivors as a single consolidated PR comment. Project-local contributor tooling.
two-lens-review
Run pixtuoid's review protocol at either scope — the mandatory pre-merge DIFF gate (2+ differentiated-lens agents on the diff) or a whole-codebase AUDIT (subsystem × factor fan-out over the whole tree). Both draw ONE shared factor taxonomy + verify contract + disposition; they differ only in population and orchestration. Use before merging ANY PR, on 'review this PR/branch' / 'is this ready to merge' (diff scope), or on 'whole-codebase review' / pre-release / periodic audit (whole-codebase scope). Encodes the five hard requirements, the escalation triggers, the adversarial finder→verify fan-out, and the disposition sweep the repo learned the hard way.
lens-catalog
Lens roster, panel-selection rules, and severity/needs-decision anchors for the /superutils:spec-review loop. Load when composing a review panel or grading findings.