zero-shot

Solid

Use when the user asks to "check zero-shot", "audit few-shot anchoring", "find example anchoring", or invokes /zero-shot. Read-only audit of LLM-facing prose: principle over anchoring examples.

AI & Automation 125 stars 11 forks Updated today MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 84/100

Stars 20%
70
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Zero-Shot Audit A semantic audit of LLM-facing prose for the Zero-Shot Instruction Preference: state principles, not anchoring examples. Read-only — it emits structured findings and writes no fixes. The human author decides which to rewrite, mark as scope-clarifying, or dismiss. ## Purpose Surface few-shot patches that anchor the model to specific instances rather than letting it apply the principle to novel contexts. Anchoring drift survives deterministic structural checks — it is a meaning-level pattern, so a semantic reviewer catches what literal pattern matching cannot. ## Inputs **Manual invocation only** (interactive `/zero-shot`): - The caller passes target file paths or a glob; with no argument, the skill enumerates the in-scope set under the working tree HEAD. - Files are read at their working-tree state — the post-edit, pre-commit content the author is about to ship. ## Scope **In scope** (LLM-facing prose where this principle applies): - Skill instruction files (`*/skills/*/SKILL.md`), considered outside formal/definition blocks - Agent system-prompt files (`*/agents/*.md`) - Output-style files **Out of scope** (the principle does not apply or examples serve a different purpose): - Formal-definition blocks within instruction files — regions delimited by `── <NAME> ──` headers (FLOW, MORPHISM, TYPES, PHASE TRANSITIONS, and peers). Notation patterns are the content there. - Fenced code blocks (` ``` ... ``` `) — code is content, and example code attached to...

Details

Author
jongwony
Repository
jongwony/epistemic-protocols
Created
7 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
JavaScript
License
MIT

Bundled in these plugins

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Solid

white-bear

Use when the user asks to "check white bear", "audit prohibitions", "find negative framing", or invokes /white-bear. Read-only audit: unnecessary competing-target mentions in LLM-facing prose.

125 Updated today
jongwony
AI & Automation Listed

skill-zero

Use this skill when the task involves coding-agent interpretability, hidden states, residual streams, linear probes, latent programming horizons, edit-outcome prediction, or monitor-and-steer workflows for coding agents. Applies the linear-probe procedure (Silva, Tu, Monperrus 2026) with expected AUC numbers, horizon k≈25, mid-layer inverted-U, and cross-benchmark transfer. Trigger when the user says "skill zero", "interpret the coding agent", "probe the agent's hidden states", or asks to predict/monitor a coding agent's edit outcomes. Do NOT trigger for general non-trivial tasks without an interpretability angle — use `think-like-gpt-5-6` or `super-skill` for those instead. This skill also contains a legacy General-mode rigor framework in its body for backward compatibility; new callers should prefer `think-like-gpt-5-6` for that use case.

1 Updated 1 weeks ago
anshmajumdar121
AI & Automation Listed

idd-spec-audit

Repo-local, dogfood-only semantic audit of the IDD instruction corpus for leaked session context, cross-file contradictions, fresh-memory completability gaps, and automation blockers. Use only in the kurone-kito/idd-skill source repository, on request, to audit .github/instructions, skills/issue-authoring, CLAUDE.md, or .github/copilot-instructions.md. Read-only — never edits files or mutates issues.

4 Updated 3 days ago
kurone-kito