qa-handoff

Solid

Generate a hands-on QA testing guide with walkthrough scenarios and exploratory testing checklist.

Testing & QA 416 stars 49 forks Updated yesterday MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 93/100

Stars 20%
87
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# QA Handoff **Applicability:** This command is designed for Rails applications that follow a PRD-driven development workflow with `docs/prd/ROADMAP.md` and a debriefs structure under `docs/debriefs/`. If the current project is not a Rails application or does not follow this structure, stop and tell the user this skill is not applicable to the current project. --- You are a senior developer preparing a hands-on testing guide for a QA colleague. Your colleague is technically capable — they run the app locally, can execute the test suite, and are excellent at finding gaps in behavior and UX. They are NOT tracking implementation details, architecture decisions, or code-level rationale. Write for someone who understands the product but needs a clear, step-by-step guide to exercise the new work. ## Context 1. Read the project's `CLAUDE.md` and `docs/prd/ROADMAP.md` to orient yourself. Identify the project name, current phase, and any project-specific testing guidance (viewport requirements, audience-specific considerations, etc.). 2. Check `docs/debriefs/full/` for the most recent debrief. If one exists for the current work, use its Product Tour section as your primary source for walkthrough scenarios. Adapt the content for a QA audience: strip architecture rationale, keep the step-by-step actions and expected behaviors, and add exploratory testing prompts. 3. If no recent debrief exists, build the walkthrough from scratch by reviewing recent git history, seed data, routes, a...

Details

Author
joshukraine
Repository
joshukraine/dotfiles
Created
11 years ago
Last Updated
yesterday
Language
Shell
License
MIT

Integrates with

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

Testing & QA Listed

qa

QA a web app at a given URL — smoke test critical paths, report bugs with repro steps, optionally fix and re-verify. Use when validating a running build, after a deploy, or before handing off to stakeholders. Prefers Playwright or browser MCP when available.

0 Updated yesterday
yusufkaracaburun
AI & Automation Listed

agentic-qa-onboard

Walks new users through this repo's QA flow — Playwright + KATA + Allure + Xray stack, Jira QA workflow (Backlog → Shift-Left QA → Estimation → Ready For Dev → Ready For QA → In Testing → Tested → Closed), /shift-left-testing for pre-sprint AC refinement on backlog Stories, /sprint-testing for in-sprint manual QA, /test-documentation for TMS test cases, /test-automation for KATA-compliant E2E/API tests, /regression-testing for CI suite execution, /framework-development for boilerplate evolution, MCPs available (Context7, Tavily, Atlassian, Playwright, DBHub, OpenAPI, Postman), critical env vars. Triggers on: `onboard me to QA`, `explain this QA repo`, `first time using this`, `primer vez en QA`, `/agentic-qa-onboard`. Do NOT use for: pre-sprint refinement (use /shift-left-testing), feature QA on a ticket (use /sprint-testing), authoring test cases in TMS (use /test-documentation), writing automated tests (use /test-automation), running regression suites (use /regression-testing).

11 Updated today
upex-galaxy
Testing & QA Solid

team-qa

Orchestrate the QA team through a full testing cycle. Coordinates qa-lead (strategy + test plan) and qa-tester (test case writing + bug reporting) to produce a complete QA package for a sprint or feature. Covers: test plan generation, test case writing, smoke check gate, manual QA execution, and sign-off report.

20,436 Updated 1 weeks ago
Donchitos
AI & Automation Listed

qa

Verify a feature works after implementation. Actively try to break it — edge cases, error paths, integration wiring, and real usage flows.

298 Updated today
kdlbs
Testing & QA Listed

qa-testing

Run QA testing on a page, feature, or full site at one of three depth tiers (smoke, standard, full). Use this skill whenever the user asks to test a page, audit a site, check for bugs, verify a deploy, run a QA sweep, or review accessibility, performance, or SEO basics. Triggers on test, QA, audit, verify, check, is it working, does it look right, broken, 404, image not loading, post-deploy check, regression test. Also triggers proactively after any significant code change or new page launch where verification matters.

2 Updated yesterday
rampstackco