board-column-flow

Featured

Use when moving tasks or reporting status - the kanban column semantics, which columns are human/architect/QA gates, and where the PM actually acts

AI & Automation 91 stars 13 forks Updated today Apache-2.0

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 89/100

Stars 20%
65
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Board Column Flow ## Overview The board has more columns than the PM acts in. Knowing which columns belong to the human, the architect, and QA keeps you from moving a task through a gate that isn't yours. ## The columns ``` backlog → todo → in_progress → analiz_review → code_review → ready_for_qa → in_qa → pm_uat → human_uat → done → released need_revision ← any gate that rejects (code_review, in_qa, pm_uat, human_uat) → back to in_progress' owner, then forward again from code_review ``` (`analiz_review` and `code_review` are gates for specific work; a given task only passes through the columns its type needs. `need_revision` is not a stage in the line — it is where every gate sends work back.) ## Who owns each gate | Column | Owner | PM action? | |--------|-------|-----------| | backlog | PM | Yes — create tasks here by default; stakeholder prioritizes | | todo | assignee agent (auto) | Move approved tasks here to start them | | in_progress | developer | No | | **analiz_review** | **human** | **No** — the human approves the architect's plan (→ done) or rejects it (→ need_revision) | | code_review | system-architect | No — architect advances to ready_for_qa or need_revision | | ready_for_qa | QA (queue — QA takes it into in_qa) | No | | in_qa | QA (testing in progress) | No | | need_revision | developer / architect | Read the reason; clarify AC if the gap is a requirements ambiguity, else leave the owner to fix | | **pm_uat** | **PM** | **Yes**...

Details

Author
makifbaysal
Repository
makifbaysal/tasktrooper
Created
1 weeks ago
Last Updated
today
Language
Go
License
Apache-2.0

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Listed

pm

PM+SA orchestration lane — one command runs the whole virtual team so the owner only watches results. Reads the tracker + the sprint plan + the decision queue → picks the highest-value UNBLOCKED work → dispatches to the right lane (/ba for backlog, /dev for code, /qa for verification, the SA lane for ADRs) with every child gate intact → ends each session with the 'your desk' report: done / needs-you / upcoming deadlines. Blocked work stays blocked — open business questions are collected for the owner, never answered by the machine.

6 Updated 5 days ago
connorpham
AI & Automation Featured

pm

When you want to manage projects across your businesses using a kanban + Eisenhower methodology. One kanban per business (whatever portfolio of businesses, projects, or initiatives you run). Tool-agnostic — connects via API/MCP to whatever PM tool each business uses (Notion, GitHub Projects, Plane, Linear, Obsidian file-based, or manual mode). Async-first output. Six modes — setup (scaffold a new board for a business), triage (Eisenhower-sort the backlog), next (pick the next thing to work on, single board or across all), status (paste-ready async snapshot), unblock (diagnose Review/Blocked column), weekly (Friday pulse + week planning). Triggers on "/pm," "/pm setup," "/pm triage," "/pm next," "/pm status," "/pm unblock," "/pm weekly," "what should I work on next," "kanban status," "Eisenhower this," "triage my backlog," "what's blocked."

825 Updated 3 weeks ago
coreyhaines31
AI & Automation Listed

workflow

The operating rhythm. Use as the company handbook for how any change moves from request to landed-and-green in any repo — adversarial review before merge, the per-repo validation gates, commit/push/CI cadence, background-work handling, and honest reporting. Every specialist follows this loop; triage names the owner, this governs how they work.

0 Updated 3 days ago
InauguralSystems