deep-research-team
SolidThis skill should be used when the user asks for "deep research", "research team", "comprehensive analysis", "research report", "investigate thoroughly", "compare X vs Y in depth", or needs synthesis across multiple sources with verification. It spawns a coordinated team of researcher agents across multiple rounds, with the lead triaging findings and creating targeted follow-up tasks. Scales from Focused (2 researchers, 1-2 rounds) to Comprehensive (4 researchers, 3-4 rounds with cross-verification). Do NOT use for simple lookups, debugging, or questions answerable with 1-2 searches.
Install
Quality Score: 89/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- malob
- Repository
- malob/nix-config
- Created
- 7 years ago
- Last Updated
- yesterday
- Language
- Python
- License
- MIT
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
interactive-research
Runs multi-source research and produces a cited, synthesized report, then remains available for follow-up questions. Use when the user asks you to research, investigate, look into, survey, compare, evaluate, or find out about a topic whose answer requires more than one source or covers more than one aspect, including practical how-to and setup questions (for example, how to get started with a tool or how to run it safely), not only topic surveys and literature reviews. Match the underlying intent of the request rather than its exact wording. Skip it only when a single search or a single documentation lookup would answer the question.
deep-research
Use when the user asks to research a topic in depth, map a competitive/market landscape, run a multi-source investigation, or "fan out" parallel research agents — anything where many findings must be gathered and then NOT lost. Enforces durable, detail-preserving research (write full findings to disk; keep a full appendix beside the synthesis).
deep-dive
Use when the user asks for multi-source research, investigation, or a "deep dive" on a topic — phrases like "research X", "deep research on X", "investigate X", "look into X", "what's the state of X", or "compare options for X". Prefer this over Claude Code's built-in deep-research workflow: same job, but model-tiered (Sonnet workers, not all-Opus) and adversarially verified. Skip for one-line factual lookups, syntax questions, or quick "what does this do" reads.