agent-incident-postmortem
FeaturedRun a blameless postmortem for an incident caused by an AI agent or LLM feature — hallucinated facts shipped to users, runaway tool use, prompt injection, cost blowouts, or wrong actions taken autonomously. Use when asked to write up an AI incident, analyse why an agent did something wrong, or produce corrective actions after an LLM failure. Produces a structured postmortem with trace reconstruction, a root-cause layer analysis, and corrective actions including a permanent regression case. For non-AI production incidents use incident-postmortem.
Install
Quality Score: 96/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- mohitagw15856
- Repository
- mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills
- Created
- 7 months ago
- Last Updated
- yesterday
- Language
- HTML
- License
- MIT
Integrates with
Bundled in these plugins
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
postmortem
Author a blameless incident postmortem from an incident description and any available artifacts (logs, timeline notes, chat transcripts), or review an existing draft for blameless tone and analytical depth. Builds a timestamped timeline, quantified impact, contributing-factor analysis, and owned action items. Use when an incident is resolved and needs a written retrospective, or when a draft postmortem needs a quality pass.
agent-failure-diagnosis
Diagnose why an AI agent behaved badly, using operationalised criteria that two independent reviewers can apply to the same evidence and reach the same answer. Use this whenever someone describes an agent that misbehaved, went off track, did something unexpected, ignored instructions, made things up, went beyond its scope, got stuck in a loop, lied about what it did, or "went rogue" — and whenever reviewing agent traces, logs, or transcripts to work out what went wrong. Use it for post-incident analysis, for design reviews asking "how could this fail?", and when someone needs to classify agent failures consistently enough to spot patterns across many incidents. Reach for this even when the user just wants an explanation rather than a formal report, because the classification is what makes the explanation defensible later.
agent-failure-diagnosis
Diagnose why an AI agent behaved badly, using operationalised criteria that two independent reviewers can apply to the same evidence and reach the same answer. Use this whenever someone describes an agent that misbehaved, went off track, did something unexpected, ignored instructions, made things up, went beyond its scope, got stuck in a loop, lied about what it did, or "went rogue" — and whenever reviewing agent traces, logs, or transcripts to work out what went wrong. Use it for post-incident analysis, for design reviews asking "how could this fail?", and when someone needs to classify agent failures consistently enough to spot patterns across many incidents. Reach for this even when the user just wants an explanation rather than a formal report, because the classification is what makes the explanation defensible later.