bid-tender-review

Featured

Analyse a construction bid or tender package for scope gaps, risk-shifting exclusions, unit-rate red flags, and front-loading in the schedule of values. Use when asked to review a bid, level bids, check a tender for gaps, compare sub quotes, or vet a schedule of values before award. Produces a structured bid review with a gap register, exclusion risk table, pricing red flags, and an award recommendation with pre-award clarifications.

AI & Automation 1,404 stars 250 forks Updated today MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 96/100

Stars 20%
100
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Bid / Tender Review Skill A low bid is only cheap if the scope is actually in it. This skill runs the review an experienced estimator or owner's rep would run before award: reconcile the bid against the bid documents, hunt the exclusions and qualifications that quietly shift risk back to the buyer, test unit rates against sanity ranges, and check the schedule of values for front-loading. The goal is a levelled, apples-to-apples view and a written list of what to clarify **before** signing — not after mobilisation. ## What This Skill Produces - A **scope gap register** — items in the bid documents but missing, excluded, or ambiguous in the bid - An **exclusions & qualifications risk table** — each one classified by who ends up holding the risk - **Pricing red flags** — outlier unit rates, unbalanced line items, allowances hiding real cost - A **front-loading check** on the schedule of values - An **award recommendation** with pre-award clarification questions (RFI-to-bidder list) ## Required Inputs Ask for these if not provided; if working from a thin brief, proceed and label every assumption `[assumed]`: - **The bid/quote itself** (pricing, exclusions, qualifications, allowances, schedule of values if given) - **Scope of work / bid documents** — drawings list, spec sections, or at least a scope narrative - **Contract form and delivery method** (lump sum, GMP, unit price, design-build) — it changes what "excluded" means - **Competing bids** (optional, for levelling) an...

Details

Author
mohitagw15856
Repository
mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills
Created
8 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
HTML
License
MIT

Integrates with

Bundled in these plugins

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

Data & Documents Listed

bid-gen

Run and improve the bid-gen-v3 engineering bid generation pipeline for Chinese construction tender technical proposals. Use when Codex needs to process a tender/RFP project directory, extract bid requirements, build project_brain/chapter_plan/disqualification_rules, generate or review construction organization design chapters, assemble DOCX output, run compliance/format/similarity gates, debug bid-gen scripts, or apply bid-gen memory feedback.

3 Updated 1 months ago
tiettuo
AI & Automation Listed

constructability-risk-review

Constructability risk review of a drawing set for construction and design work, covering preconstruction, drawings, risk. You are pricing or planning a job and want a structured list of buildability questions before the bid goes in. Use when the user asks for help with constructability risk review of a drawing set, or is working on preconstruction, drawings, risk in a construction, engineering or design context. Produces a reviewable draft, never a final answer.

1 Updated yesterday
constructelligence-lab
AI & Automation Featured

bom-cost-review

Review a bill of materials for cost, risk, and supply exposure — cost rollup, top-10 cost drivers, single-source and EOL risk, MOQ vs forecast mismatch, cost-down candidates, and tariff/logistics sensitivity. Use when asked to review a BOM, find cost-down opportunities, check component sourcing risk, or sanity-check BOM cost against target. Produces a structured BOM review with a cost driver Pareto, risk flags per line, and a prioritised cost-down list.

1,404 Updated today
mohitagw15856