go-linting
SolidUse when setting up linting for a Go project, configuring golangci-lint, picking a linter set, suppressing findings with //nolint, or wiring lint checks into CI. Apply proactively whenever a project lacks .golangci.yml, when lint output is unclear, or when a new package needs the project's quality bar. Does not cover code review process (see go-code-review).
Install
Quality Score: 82/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- muratmirgun
- Repository
- muratmirgun/gophers
- Created
- 2 months ago
- Last Updated
- 1 weeks ago
- Language
- Python
- License
- MIT
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
golang-lint
Linting best practices and golangci-lint configuration for Golang projects — running linters, configuring .golangci.yml, suppressing warnings with nolint directives, interpreting lint output, and selecting linters. Use when configuring golangci-lint, asking about lint warnings or nolint suppressions, setting up code quality tooling, or choosing linters. Also use when the user mentions golangci-lint, go vet, staticcheck, or revive.
golang-lint
Provides linting best practices and golangci-lint configuration for Go projects. Covers running linters, configuring .golangci.yml, suppressing warnings with nolint directives, interpreting lint output, and managing linter settings. Use this skill whenever the user runs linters, configures golangci-lint, asks about lint warnings or suppressions, sets up code quality tooling, or asks which linters to enable for a Go project. Also use when the user mentions golangci-lint, go vet, staticcheck, revive, or any Go linting tool.
linting
Use when fixing machine-detectable code issues — run linters and static analyzers (ESLint, Ruff, Clippy, golangci-lint), resolve findings, suppress false positives with justification, tighten config. Automated quality gate, distinct from human-judgment review. Triggers on "lint", "linting", "fix eslint", "static analysis", "lint 修复", "静态分析", "格式检查", "代码规范检查". Not for human-judgment code review (use code-review), runtime behavior bugs (use debugging), or behavior-preserving structural refactoring (use refactoring).