debate

Featured

Have the Claude and GPT partners critique each other's answers across a configurable number of rounds (default 1) before converging on a synthesis. Use when the user wants the two perspectives stress-tested against each other, not just shown side by side.

AI & Automation 9,848 stars 1535 forks Updated today Apache-2.0

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 89/100

Stars 20%
100
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# debate — make the two partners argue it out Normally Debby fans a question out to both partners and shows the two answers side by side. **debate** goes further: it relays each partner's answer to the *other* partner for criticism, loops that for a configurable number of rounds, and then converges on a synthesis. ## Rounds The user picks how many rounds of back-and-forth to run. **Default: 1 round.** A "round" is one full cross-critique exchange (each partner sees and criticizes the other's latest answer). Honor an explicit count from the user ("debate this for 3 rounds"); otherwise run 1. ## Procedure 1. **Round 0 — collect the opening answers.** If you do not already have a fresh answer from each partner for this question, dispatch it to both `claude` and `gpt` in parallel via `sys_session_send` (ANSWER mode), give each call a stable per-partner `title` — the topic with the partner's name attached (e.g. `debate-pricing-claude` / `debate-pricing-gpt`), end your turn, and collect both with `sys_read_inbox`. If you already showed the user both answers this turn, reuse those as round 0. 2. **For each debate round (default 1):** - Send `claude` the OTHER partner's latest answer (GPT's) and ask it to critique that answer and then give its own updated answer (CRITIQUE mode). Reuse that partner's own `title` so it continues its thread. - Send `gpt` the OTHER partner's latest answer (Claude's) and ask the same. Dispatch both in the same ...

Details

Author
omnigent-ai
Repository
omnigent-ai/omnigent
Created
3 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
Python
License
Apache-2.0

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Listed

debate

Have the Claude and GPT partners critique each other's answers across a configurable number of rounds (default 1) before converging on a synthesis. Use when the user wants the two perspectives stress-tested against each other, not just shown side by side.

0 Updated 1 months ago
sarptandoven
AI & Automation Listed

council

Fan out a question to Claude and GPT-5.6-sol in parallel, run up to 3 rounds of adversarial debate where each model challenges the other's weakest argument and updates its position, assess convergence after each round with a dedicated subagent, then synthesize and deliver a final answer weighted by argument quality — not consensus.

0 Updated 2 days ago
steven112163
AI & Automation Listed

claude-discuss

Iterative non-code discussion between the local agent and Claude Code CLI on any open-ended topic: diet, fitness, writing, decisions, strategy, study plans, life choices, brainstorming. Orchestrates an automatic back-and-forth debate where both agents critique, propose alternatives, and iterate on the user's idea until reaching consensus. Claude Code runs READ-ONLY (headless plan mode), forms its own opinions, and normally does not navigate the filesystem unless the user provides file paths. Use when the user says discuss with claude, iterate with claude, consult claude, debate with claude, ask claude for a second opinion, get claude's take, or brainstorm with claude, including pasting or describing a plan, draft, idea, decision, or proposal and wanting a critical iterative review. Does NOT trigger on code review, plan review of implementation plans, architecture discussions, or any technical software-engineering analysis; use claude-review for those.

4 Updated 1 weeks ago
mryll