code-review

Solid

Review code changes for bugs, security issues, and improvements

AI & Automation 77 stars 4 forks Updated today Apache-2.0

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 81/100

Stars 20%
63
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
64
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Code Review Review the current git diff or specified files for defects and improvements. ## Instructions 1. Run `git diff` (or `git diff --cached` for staged changes) to obtain the changeset. If specific files are provided, scope the review to those files. 2. Read each changed file in full to understand surrounding context, not just the diff hunks. 3. Analyze every change for the following categories: - **Bugs**: Logic errors, off-by-one mistakes, null/undefined access, race conditions, missing error handling. - **Security**: Injection vulnerabilities, hardcoded secrets, unsafe deserialization, missing auth checks. - **Performance**: Unnecessary allocations, O(n^2) patterns, missing caching opportunities, redundant I/O. - **Style**: Naming inconsistencies, dead code, overly complex expressions, missing type annotations. 4. For each finding, report: - File path and line number - Severity: critical, warning, or suggestion - A concise description of the issue - A recommended fix or improvement 5. Group findings by file. Present critical issues first, then warnings, then suggestions. 6. If no issues are found, confirm the changes look correct and explain why. 7. Keep feedback actionable. Avoid vague commentary; always suggest a concrete fix.

Details

Author
prapaa-ai
Repository
prapaa-ai/agav
Created
1 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
TypeScript
License
Apache-2.0

Integrates with

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category