develop-design-rationale
FeaturedDocuments the reasoning behind design decisions including alternatives considered, trade-offs evaluated, and principles applied. Use when making significant UX decisions, aligning with stakeholders on design direction, or preserving design context for future reference.
Install
Quality Score: 94/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- product-on-purpose
- Repository
- product-on-purpose/pm-skills
- Created
- 7 months ago
- Last Updated
- today
- Language
- JavaScript
- License
- Apache-2.0
Bundled in these plugins
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
design-rationale
Help designers articulate the cognitive science, behavioral psychology, and platform standards behind their design decisions. Use this skill when a designer needs to explain why they made a decision in a critique, design review, or stakeholder meeting. Also use when auditing a screen for principle alignment, preparing for pushback, or evaluating whether a decision is truly irreversible. Trigger on phrases like: "how do I explain this decision", "what principle applies here", "help me defend this", "how would I articulate why I did this", "can you audit this screen", "what's the rationale for", or any request that involves justifying a design choice with evidence beyond personal preference.
extract-design-rationale
Extract defensible design rationale from project notes, logs, specifications, research, and artifacts. Use when a case study shows what was built but not why, needs a constraint-alternatives-decision matrix, must explain rejected options and trade-offs, or needs to connect a UI, product, system, or AI-agent decision to evidence and measurable consequences.
case-study-design-decisions
Explain and defend pivotal design decisions in a case study using stakeholder context, user and business evidence, alternatives, constraints, trade-offs, consequences, limitations, and follow-up. Use when a portfolio draft shows screens without rationale, lists activities instead of decisions, needs executive credibility, must explain rejected options, or must communicate complex enterprise, platform, system, or AI-agent design choices.