← ClaudeAtlas

after-action-reportlisted

Run a structured after-action review (postmortem, retrospective) on a launch, incident, or completed project to capture timeline, root cause analysis, contributing factors, and actionable lessons. Use this skill whenever the user wants to run a postmortem, retrospective, AAR, or after-action review on any past event. Triggers on after-action report, AAR, postmortem, retrospective, retro, post-incident review, what went well what didn't, lessons learned, blameless postmortem, root cause analysis, RCA, five whys. Also triggers when the user has just shipped something or just resolved an incident and wants to capture learnings.
rampstackco/claude-skills-pm · ★ 2 · Data & Documents · score 81
Install: claude install-skill rampstackco/claude-skills-pm
# After-Action Report Run a structured retrospective on a launch, incident, or completed project. Produce actionable lessons, not just a document. This skill is for after-the-fact analysis. For active incident response, use `incident-response`. For planning launches, use `launch-runbook`. --- ## When to use - After any incident (any severity) - After every major launch - At the end of a project (sprint retro, quarterly retro, project closeout) - When a recurring issue has happened enough times to demand investigation - When a decision didn't work out and the team wants to learn ## When NOT to use - During an active incident (use `incident-response`) - For pre-launch planning (use `launch-runbook`) - For one-off bug fixes that don't merit broad analysis --- ## Required inputs - The event being analyzed (incident, launch, project) - A timeline reconstructed from logs, chat, tickets - Participant accounts of what they observed and did - Outcomes and impact (what actually happened to users, the business) --- ## The framework: blameless analysis The most important principle: blameless. Without it, retrospectives produce hidden information and theatrical lessons rather than real ones. ### What blameless means - Focus on systems, not individuals - Assume everyone made reasonable decisions given what they knew at the time - The question is "why was this decision reasonable to make?" not "who screwed up?" - Fixing the system means the next person in that situation succe