omh-autoresearch-goal

# Autoresearch Goal This is a Hermes-native `autoresearch-goal` workflow skill. ## Why This Exists `autoresearch-goal` exists to keep `research` work explicit, evidence-backed, and inside the Hermes/executor boundary instead of relying on ad hoc chat narration. ## Do Not Use When - The request is casual chat, a status-only acknowledgement, or another workflow has stronger routing evidence. - The user needs implementation, review, CI, merge, or external publishing evidence that has not been delegated or observed. ## Examples Good example: - Prompt: autoresearch-goal: keep researching AI agent memory practices until the evidence gaps are closed or logged. - Expected behavior: Run a durable research loop with critic checks, source gaps, and a stop or checkpoint condition. - Why: The request is research that needs persistence and review, not a one-shot brief. Bad example: - Prompt: autoresearch-goal: treat casual chat or unaccepted work as if this workflow already produced verified results. - Expected behavior: Ask a clarification question or route to a narrower workflow instead of forcing `autoresearch-goal`. - Why: The request lacks the required inputs or would overclaim work that Hermes did not observe. ## Completion Checklist - The research question, source boundaries, recency assumptions, and confidence level are named. - Observed sources, inference, synthesis, and unresolved retrieval gaps are separated. - Follow-up planning or handoff uses the research summary ...