survey-generator

Solid

Compile a structured literature survey on any AI/ML topic. Agent curates a research bundle (taxonomy + sections + bibliography of real papers) from a public anchor resource, then a chosen LLM generates the survey artifact. Output target is a wiki page (markdown), not a one-off HTML — survey lands in `<wiki>/derived/surveys/<slug>.md` with full bibliography rows in `sources.md`. Provider-agnostic (Anthropic/OpenAI/OpenRouter/Fireworks/custom OpenAI-compat). Use when the user asks for a "survey", "literature review", "lit review", or "deep dive" on a technical topic.

AI & Automation 2,653 stars 257 forks Updated today

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 86/100

Stars 20%
100
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
0
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Survey Generator Provider-agnostic literature-survey artifact generator. Output flows into a pro-workflow wiki, not a standalone HTML file — survives sessions and indexes for FTS5 retrieval. ## Diff vs dair-academy version | dair | pro-workflow | |------|--------------| | Hardcoded Kimi K2.6 on Fireworks | Provider-agnostic (Anthropic/OpenAI/OpenRouter/Fireworks/custom) | | Output = single-file HTML with inline SVG | Output = wiki markdown page + bibliography rows in `sources.md` | | One-off artifact, no follow-up | Persists in FTS5 index; reused by `wiki-research-loop` | | Manual run only | Composable with `/wiki research` for auto-bibliography expansion | ## When to use - "Survey on <topic>" / "lit review on <topic>" - Onboarding a new domain — generate the map-of-the-field - After a wiki has 10-30 sources, compile a synthesis page over them - Pre-step before `/wiki research` runs: gives the loop a high-quality seed bundle ## Inputs | Input | Required | Description | |-------|----------|-------------| | `topic` | yes | "Reasoning Models", "Agentic Engineering" | | `source_url` | yes | Public anchor: arXiv survey, GitHub awesome-list, canonical blog post | | `--wiki <slug>` | yes | Target wiki for the artifact | | `--bibliography-size N` | no | Default 20. 40-50 comprehensive, 80-100 exhaustive | | `--section-count N` | no | Default 6-10 numbered sections | | `--provider name` | no | Override provider (default: first env var found) | | `--model id` | no | Override m...

Details

Author
rohitg00
Repository
rohitg00/pro-workflow
Created
5 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
JavaScript
License
None

Integrates with

Bundled in these plugins

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Solid

literature-survey

Use when the user wants a comprehensive literature survey on a specific research topic. Outputs a complete PDF survey (6–20 pages, 60+ real citations, 100+ recommended) with LaTeX source, topic-specific publication figures, and a classified literature table. Single-stage, no Python runtime.

157 Updated today
ai4s-research
AI & Automation Listed

survey

Use when surveying academic literature — producing a literature review, related-work synthesis, state-of-the-art overview, or comparison of papers on a topic. Triggers include "survey the literature on X", "review papers about Y", "compare these papers", "what's the state of the art in Z", "related work for <topic>". Handles both topic-driven discovery and a supplied set of papers.

0 Updated today
steven112163
Data & Documents Listed

literature-survey

Run a rigorous state of the art literature survey on any STEM topic and deliver a compiled PDF report of about 5 pages. Opens by converging with the user on how deep and granular the survey should go, then produces a DOI verified corpus CSV, open access PDFs with a request manifest, Tufte style seaborn figures, and testable hypotheses mined from the future work sections of the surveyed papers. Use whenever the user asks to survey a field, review the literature, map the state of the art, find who did it best, compare methods or benchmarks across papers, understand what a research area is solving for, or scope the open problems in a topic. Trigger on phrases like "survey the SOTA", "literature review", "state of the art of X", "what is the research on X", "who is leading in X", "map the field".

1 Updated today
DanieleMosh