agent-evals
FeaturedBuild automated evaluation suites for AI agents using golden datasets, rubrics, and regression gates. Use when shipping agent features, validating prompt changes, or gating deployments on quality.
Install
Quality Score: 98/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- sickn33
- Repository
- sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills
- Created
- 8 months ago
- Last Updated
- today
- Language
- Python
- License
- MIT
Integrates with
Bundled in these plugins
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
agent-eval
Use when measuring whether an LLM or agent system actually got better and gating merges on it: golden sets, fixing an inflated LLM-as-judge, scoring RAG (faithfulness, contextual recall) or agent trajectories (tool correctness, completion), or picking an eval framework. NOT building the agent loop, tools or RAG plumbing (that is `building-agents`).
agent-eval
Designs and runs evaluations for LLM or agent outputs — builds rubrics, sets up LLM-as-judge scoring, creates regression test sets, and reports pass rates with concrete failure examples. Use this skill whenever the user wants to evaluate, test, grade, or score an agent's or LLM's outputs; asks "how do I know if this is working," "is this any good," "set up an eval," or "did this prompt change make things worse"; needs a rubric for judging quality; wants to compare two prompts, models, or outputs; or wants to catch regressions before shipping a change. Also trigger when reviewing agent trajectories specifically — did the agent pick the right tool, the right arguments, the right sequence — not just the final output.
agent-eval
Build an evaluation harness for an LLM agent, prompt template, or tool-using workflow — a task set, deterministic and judge-based scoring, per-tag metrics, and a regression gate — then run it. Use it when a prompt or model change needs to be measured instead of eyeballed, or when a project ships LLM behavior with no eval set at all.