council

Solid

4-perspective decision evaluation for architecture choices. Triggers: council, evaluate decision, pros cons, multi-angle, alternatives.

AI & Automation 155 stars 19 forks Updated 2 days ago MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 93/100

Stars 20%
73
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
80
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Decision Council $ARGUMENTS Evaluate a decision from 4 distinct perspectives using parallel sub-agents, then synthesize a weighted recommendation. ## Usage ``` /council [decision question or proposal to evaluate] ``` ## What This Command Does 1. **Parses** the decision question from user input 2. **Gathers** codebase context relevant to the decision 3. **Spawns** 4 parallel sub-agents — each analyzing from a different perspective 4. **Synthesizes** all perspectives into a structured recommendation with decision matrix ## MANDATORY: You MUST use the Agent tool **DO NOT analyze the decision yourself.** Your job is to parse the question, spawn 4 sub-agents in parallel via the `Agent` tool, and synthesize their outputs. If you attempt to provide all perspectives inline, you have failed. ## Process ### 1. Parse the Decision Extract from the user's input: - **The proposal** — what is being considered - **The alternatives** — what the options are (if not stated, infer the implicit alternative: status quo) - **The context** — what project/codebase/situation this applies to If the question is too vague to evaluate, ask ONE clarifying question before proceeding. ### 2. Gather Context Before spawning agents, quickly scan the codebase for relevant context: - Current tech stack, dependencies, patterns in use - Existing code related to the decision area - Configuration, infrastructure, or architectural choices already made Include this context in each sub-agent prompt so...

Details

Author
softspark
Repository
softspark/ai-toolkit
Created
2 months ago
Last Updated
2 days ago
Language
Python
License
MIT

Integrates with

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category