ticket-format

Solid

Use when creating, drafting, or grooming a Linear or Superset ticket in this repo. Defines the canonical three-section structure.

Code & Development 11,227 stars 938 forks Updated today NOASSERTION

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 79/100

Stars 20%
100
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
34
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Ticket Format ## Context 2–4 sentences. What's broken or wanted, and why. Outcome-focused, not solution-focused. ## References Where the ticket came from. Omit section if none. | Source | Who | Link | Date | |--------|-----|------|------| | Slack #feedback | @alice | [thread](…) | 2026-05-10 | ## Implementation notes Agent-groomed. Leave empty if you don't have codebase context — a later grooming pass will fill it in. When you do fill it in, use these sub-headings and skip what doesn't apply: - `### Files` — `path:line` + why relevant - `### Approach` — one paragraph - `### Related code` — similar patterns in the repo - `### Gotchas` — constraints, prior incidents

Details

Author
superset-sh
Repository
superset-sh/superset
Created
7 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
TypeScript
License
NOASSERTION

Related Skills

Code & Development Featured

code-reviewer

Analyzes code diffs and files to identify bugs, security vulnerabilities (SQL injection, XSS, insecure deserialization), code smells, N+1 queries, naming issues, and architectural concerns, then produces a structured review report with prioritized, actionable feedback. Use when reviewing pull requests, conducting code quality audits, identifying refactoring opportunities, or checking for security issues. Invoke for PR reviews, code quality checks, refactoring suggestions, review code, code quality. Complements specialized skills (security-reviewer, test-master) by providing broad-scope review across correctness, performance, maintainability, and test coverage in a single pass.

9,342 Updated 5 days ago
Jeffallan
Code & Development Featured

security-reviewer

Identifies security vulnerabilities, generates structured audit reports with severity ratings, and provides actionable remediation guidance. Use when conducting security audits, reviewing code for vulnerabilities, or analyzing infrastructure security. Invoke for SAST scans, penetration testing, DevSecOps practices, cloud security reviews, dependency audits, secrets scanning, or compliance checks. Produces vulnerability reports, prioritized recommendations, and compliance checklists.

9,342 Updated 5 days ago
Jeffallan
Code & Development Featured

parallel-investigation

Coordinates parallel investigation threads to simultaneously explore multiple hypotheses or root causes across different system areas. Use when debugging production incidents, slow API performance, multi-system integration failures, or complex bugs where the root cause is unclear and multiple plausible theories exist; when serial troubleshooting is too slow; or when multiple investigators can divide root-cause analysis work. Provides structured phases for problem decomposition, thread assignment, sync points with Continue/Pivot/Converge decisions, and final report synthesis.

745 Updated 1 months ago
rohitg00