review-resume

Solid

Review a freshly uploaded resume and save a stronger rewritten version as a suggestion the user accepts or discards in the dashboard.

Code & Development 67 stars 17 forks Updated yesterday MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 84/100

Stars 20%
61
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Review Resume Save one improved version of a base resume as a `Suggested rewrite` variant. The user accepts or discards it in the dashboard. **Never write to the base resume.** Runs after `extract-resume` on upload: extraction is faithful to the PDF, this pass makes the document better. ## Setup Follow `../_shared/setup.md`, then: ```bash curl -fsS -H "authorization: Bearer $JOBPILOT_API_TOKEN" "$JOBPILOT_API/api/resumes/$RESUME_ID" ``` `content: null` → extraction hasn't run; say so and stop. Also `Read` the source PDF (path per `../_shared/setup.md`) - extraction flattens two-column layouts and drops emphasis. ## What to improve For a human screener skimming, and the ATS parsing: - **`summary`** - what they do, at what level, two strongest specifics. Cut anything true of every candidate. - **`basics.headline`** - a role title people search for, not a slogan. - **Bullets** - outcome first, consistent tense, no "Responsible for" / "Worked on" / "Helped with". Remove phrasing repeated across entries - one stock phrase in three roles flattens all three. - **Skill groups** - consolidate. Past ~5 groups it reads as a keyword dump. - **Ordering** - most relevant experience and projects first. Then run the `humanizer` skill in **embedded mode** on the summary and bullets. ## Rules The user sees a diff and clicks accept, so the diff is the guard - not a server check: 1. **Wording, ordering, emphasis, grouping. Never facts.** No employer, date, title, degree, school, o...

Details

Author
suxrobGM
Repository
suxrobGM/jobpilot
Created
5 months ago
Last Updated
yesterday
Language
TypeScript
License
MIT

Integrates with

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

Code & Development Listed

resume-review

Critically review a resume/CV against ATS (applicant tracking system) parsing rules, recruiter skim patterns, and keyword alignment with a target job description. Use when the user asks to "review my resume/CV", "check my resume against this job ad", "will this pass ATS", or shares a resume file (.docx/.pdf/.md) for feedback. Provides scored, prioritised, critical feedback — not a rewrite.

14 Updated 1 months ago
promptmechanic
AI & Automation Listed

rewrite-resume

Rewrites and upgrades the user's resume section by section for a specific target job, with ATS keyword coverage and formatting checks. Use when the user says "rewrite my resume", "tailor my resume to this job", "resume for this JD", or runs /rewrite-resume. For the LinkedIn profile version use rewrite-linkedin-profile; for keyword mining alone use jd-keyword-miner.

0 Updated 2 weeks ago
stalinzbb
Code & Development Listed

campus-resume-review

Review one candidate's resume against a specific role and produce a hiring-manager-ready evidence card - claims graded by how verifiable they are, rubric ratings that cite their evidence, integrity flags, and the three-to-five interview questions actually worth asking. Built for Chinese campus and internship hiring (校招/实习/秋招/暑期实习/提前批), where candidates have no employment history and most of the page is unverifiable self-report. Use this whenever someone asks you to screen, evaluate, assess, review, or "take a look at" a candidate's or applicant's resume or CV against a job, whether or not they say the words "campus hiring" - and use it even when they just want a quick read, because the fast answer is exactly where an ungrounded one does the most damage. Do not use it to write, improve, or tailor someone's own resume for their own job search.

0 Updated 2 weeks ago
Jerry6063