review-prose-fix

# Review a prose fix Judge what a copy edit did to a document. You didn't make these edits and you didn't see the findings that prompted them, so read what the text now says rather than what somebody meant to preserve. The gates already ran. Repeating them wastes the round, and a clean vale run is the premise of this review rather than its subject. Your subject is everything vale can't score. ## The repository `$ARGUMENTS` Treat the first word as the repository. A second word, when present, is the target file. Bind them once: ```bash REPO="${ARGUMENTS%% *}" ``` ## Gather the inputs From `$REPO`, run these before judging anything: - `bash .claude/skills/fix-prose/scripts/check-suppressions.sh --diff` for what changed - `bash .claude/skills/fix-prose/scripts/check-suppressions.sh --verify` for edits outside the target - `cat` the target for the result in one piece The diff is the review. Where it comes back empty, the fixer changed nothing, and that's a finding unless its report said so. Where the caller passed the fixer's report, read it too. A claim there that the diff doesn't support is a finding in itself. ## What to check Every finding names the exact text and the correction. ### Meaning The document says what it said before. - Flag any claim that changed. A dropped qualifier, an added hedge, or an absolute turned conditional edits the argument while looking like a reword. - Flag any number, path, identifier, filename, flag, or proper noun that differs. The...