design-audit

Run systematic **technical** quality checks and generate a scored report. Don't fix issues — document them for other commands to address. This is a code-level audit, not a design critique. Check what's measurable and verifiable in the implementation. ## Preparation Read `~/.claude/skills/minoan-frontend-design/SKILL.md` for anti-pattern guidance. Check `.design-context.md` for project context if it exists. **Read the ignore list** at `.design-critique/ignore.md` if it exists. Findings matching an ignore entry (case-insensitive substring) should be silently dropped — the user has already acknowledged them as deferred tradeoffs or accepted deviations. ## Diagnostic Scan Check 5 dimensions. Score each 0-4 using `~/.claude/skills/minoan-frontend-design/references/heuristics-scoring.md` criteria. ### 1. Accessibility - Contrast ratios < 4.5:1 (or 7:1 for AAA) - Missing ARIA: interactive elements without proper roles, labels, states - Keyboard: missing focus indicators, illogical tab order, keyboard traps - Semantic HTML: heading hierarchy, landmarks, divs-as-buttons - Form issues: inputs without labels, poor error messaging **Score**: 0=Inaccessible, 1=Major gaps, 2=Partial effort, 3=WCAG AA mostly met, 4=WCAG AA fully met ### 2. Performance - Layout thrashing: reading/writing layout properties in loops - Expensive animations: casual layout-property animation, unbounded blur/filter/shadow effects, or effects that visibly drop frames - Missing optimization: no lazy loading...