skill-review

# Skill Review **Core responsibility:** Find real behavioral gaps in a Lattice skill by reviewing it through three independent personas. Each persona sees the skill with different eyes, cares about different things, and may surface different gaps. The combined findings should be more practical and complete than any single review. **Input:** One skill path or skill name. **Output:** A unified findings report — only the high-confidence, practical gaps from all three personas, merged, deduplicated, pruned, and ordered by severity — with proposed fixes. **Review standard:** Prefer omission over speculation. Only report findings you are highly confident would surface in normal use, belong to this skill's responsibility, and would materially improve outcomes if fixed. A valid review may conclude that no material practical gaps remain. **How to verify this skill did its job:** - Every reported finding is grounded in a realistic scenario and tied to specific evidence in the skill - Zero findings is acceptable if no high-confidence practical gaps remain - Every gap has a specific proposed fix, not just a flag - Overlapping findings from multiple personas are merged into one entry with a note that multiple perspectives agree - Multiple personas agreeing raises confidence only after the finding survives the practicality filter - The final report is ordered: critical gaps first, warnings second, observations last — or explicitly says no material practical gaps were found - After fix...