gap-analysis

Solid

Performs a gap analysis between two artifacts (a current state and a desired state) and produces a plain-language, stakeholder-readable report indexed by stable gap IDs. Use when the user wants to compare, evaluate, audit, or reconcile one artifact against another — including spec-vs-implementation gaps, PRD-vs-shipped-feature gaps, design-vs-build gaps, requirements-vs-code audits, or any "what's missing from X compared to Y" question — and wants a human-readable report rather than raw analyst output. Orchestrates the `gap-analyzer` agent for the primary analysis, then runs a validator-and- augmenter swarm by default to corroborate, contradict, and enrich the findings — including an actor-perspective sweep across human users, API callers, AI agents, and other actor types. The user may opt out of the swarm with `no swarm` to fall back to a lightweight gap-analyzer-only pass. Recommends a swarm team size (small / medium / large) based on gap count, gap-category distribution, and the specific domains the gaps t

Web & Frontend 66 stars 5 forks Updated today MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 91/100

Stars 20%
61
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

## Project Context - CLAUDE.md: !`find . -maxdepth 1 -name "CLAUDE.md" -type f` - project-discovery.md: !`find . -maxdepth 3 -name "project-discovery.md" -type f` ## Operating Principles - **The `gap-analyzer` agent owns the primary analysis.** This skill does not classify gaps itself. It calls `gap-analyzer` once, reads the analyzer's full output file, and synthesizes a stakeholder-readable report from it. - **Plain language is the default surface.** Sections 1 and 2 of the report never contain file paths, line numbers, function or class names, library mechanics, or language primitives. Technical fidelity is quarantined to Section 3 and only appears when the user has explicitly requested technical details. - **The swarm runs by default.** A minimum viable swarm ships at every size: `adversarial-validator` and `junior-developer` always, plus `evidence-based-investigator` when the current state is concrete enough to verify against. The user may opt out with `no swarm` to fall back to a lightweight gap-analyzer-only pass. - **Evidence rule applies to every gap.** Apply the evidence rule from [../../references/evidence-rule.md](../../references/evidence-rule.md) when characterizing the evidence that establishes each gap. Name the trust class of every citation pair (codebase, web, provided); apply the corroboration gate to web-source claims that establish a gap; and label gaps where the desired-state evidence is absent ("the spec is silent on X") as a distinct state, not as a ...

Details

Author
testdouble
Repository
testdouble/han
Created
3 weeks ago
Last Updated
today
Language
Shell
License
MIT

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

Web & Frontend Listed

gap-closer

Project completion skill that turns half-built things into done things. Activates when the user has an 80%-done project — a SaaS with no landing page, a side project with no README, a blog post that's a brain dump, a feature with no tests — and needs to identify the specific gap and the single next action that unblocks shipping. Audits what exists vs what was intended. Classifies gaps as broken/missing/ optional/wrong-direction. Outputs exactly ONE next action. Defines what 'done enough to ship' looks like for this specific artifact. Use when user says: help me finish this, I can't ship this, what's left, what am I missing, how do I get this across the finish line, I keep getting stuck, almost done but, I have a half-built, this is 80% done, what's blocking me, I don't know what to do next, I have this thing I never shipped, this is stuck, how do I complete this. Do NOT activate for: projects at 0% (use a planning skill), projects where the next step is clear and the user is asking how to do it, debugging. Fi

2 Updated 4 days ago
Sandeeprdy1729
AI & Automation Listed

gap-scanner

Audits AZIMUTH's coverage completeness. Cross-references what SKILL.md claims to handle against what reference, diagnostic, and domain-policy files actually cover. Identifies thin coverage, missing domains, and structural inconsistencies. Run before major version planning.

6 Updated 2 days ago
MrBinnacle
AI & Automation Solid

gap-analysis-framework

Structured gap analysis with automated comparison and prioritization for current vs future state analysis

1,034 Updated today
a5c-ai
AI & Automation Listed

docs-gap-finder

Know exactly which docs page to write next. Cross-references real user signals — failed searches, AI-unanswered questions, popular queries — against your live doc graph and returns the top 7 pages worth creating. Optionally opens a GitHub Issue with a draft outline for each. PRO+.

0 Updated 2 days ago
Docsbook-io
AI & Automation Listed

agent-gap-analyzer

Analyze project needs against existing Agent capabilities to identify coverage gaps. Reads project-profile.yaml and Agent capabilities tags, outputs deterministic coverage report. Use when evaluating which Agents are missing for a project.

1 Updated today
10CG