gap-analysis
SolidPerforms a gap analysis between two artifacts (a current state and a desired state) and produces a plain-language, stakeholder-readable report indexed by stable gap IDs. Use when the user wants to compare, evaluate, audit, or reconcile one artifact against another. Does not investigate runtime bugs — use investigate. Does not assess module-level architecture — use architectural-analysis. Does not research open-ended options with no second artifact to compare against — use research.
Install
Quality Score: 89/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- testdouble
- Repository
- testdouble/han
- Created
- 2 months ago
- Last Updated
- today
- Language
- Shell
- License
- MIT
Bundled in these plugins
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
gap-analysis
This skill should be used when analyzing design documents, specifications, or plans for completeness gaps, architectural issues, security concerns, and performance implications. Provides focus-specific detection patterns for the designer agent.
gap-analysis
Use when producing or updating a gap-analysis HTML report. Triggers on "gap analysis", "gap register", "gap index", "analyse the requirement docs", "find gaps between BPMN and requirements", or when the user references requirement / BPMN / FeatureSpec / RFP docs and asks for a structured comparison. Also triggers when the user points at a folder of existing gap-analysis reports and asks to refresh, re-roll up, or rebuild the master register/index. Produces a self-contained, theme-switching HTML report in the gap-analysis house style. Use this skill instead of free-form Markdown when the user wants a sharable HTML deliverable; do not use for prose summaries or open-question lists.
architectural-analysis
Performs deep architectural analysis of a specified module, directory, or feature area by examining structural coupling, data flow, concurrency patterns, risk, and SOLID alignment. Use when the user wants to assess, evaluate, or review the architecture, design quality, dependency structure, coupling, cohesion, or technical debt of an existing part of the codebase. Not for investigating specific bugs, runtime errors, or failures — use investigate. Not for test planning — use test-planning. Not for file-level code review — use code-review. Not for researching open-ended options, prior art, or how something works — use research. Not for writing documentation or architectural decision records.