stakeholder-summary

Solid

Produces a plain-language stakeholder summary from an existing feature specification, for sharing with non-technical stakeholders before implementation kicks off. Use when the user wants to draft a stakeholder summary, executive summary, or business summary of a feature spec or PRD. Does not write the spec itself — use plan-a-feature. Does not sequence the build into phases — use plan-a-phased-build. Does not produce an implementation plan — use plan-implementation.

Data & Documents 128 stars 13 forks Updated today MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 86/100

Stars 20%
70
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

## Project Context - CLAUDE.md: !`find . -maxdepth 1 -name "CLAUDE.md" -type f` - project-discovery.md: !`find . -maxdepth 3 -name "project-discovery.md" -type f` ## Operating Principles - **Plain language only.** The stakeholder summary never contains file paths, line numbers, function or class names, library mechanics, database tables, API shapes, or language primitives. Use product-level subsystem names ("the telematics provider", "the customer list"), user-facing UI vocabulary (badge, popup, list), and behavioral verbs (create, edit, update, claim, merge, sync). A non-technical stakeholder must be able to read the document end-to-end without translation. - **Center the customer, not the system.** Lead with the problem the customer experiences, then the capabilities introduced, then the experience, then the data flow, then what is out of scope, then the questions. The system is the means, not the subject. - **High level only.** A stakeholder summary is for getting feedback before kickoff. Skip anything that would only matter once implementation has started: schemas, sequencing, file boundaries, test plans, rollout strategy, telemetry. If a detail is only meaningful to engineers, it does not belong in this document. - **Diagrams carry weight.** Use Mermaid for both the user experience flow and the data flow before-and-after. Diagrams are not decoration — they replace paragraphs of prose, so they must be readable on their own. - **Open questions are stakeholder-shaped.** ...

Details

Author
testdouble
Repository
testdouble/han
Created
2 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
Shell
License
MIT

Bundled in these plugins

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

Code & Development Solid

plan-a-feature

Builds a feature specification from scratch through a relentless, evidence-based interview that walks the design tree decision-by-decision, resolving dependencies as it goes. Use when the user wants to plan, design, scope, specify, or flesh out a new feature, capability, or system behavior before implementation. Produces a feature specification focused on system behaviors, not implementation detail. Does not refine or stress-test an existing plan — use iterative-plan-review. Does not document already-built features — use project-documentation. Does not research open-ended options before there is a feature to specify — use research.

128 Updated today
testdouble
Code & Development Solid

plan-a-phased-build

Splits a body of context into a sequence of vertical-slice build phases where each phase is independently demonstrable to a real user and each builds on the previous. Use when the user wants to plan, sequence, phase, slice, break down, or order the build of a feature, capability, system, or initiative, and produces a plain-language phased build outline. Does not produce implementation detail — use plan-implementation. Does not specify behavior that has not been decided — use plan-a-feature. Does not perform gap analysis between two artifacts — use gap-analysis. Does not break a plan into independently-grabbable work items — use plan-work-items.

128 Updated today
testdouble
AI & Automation Featured

gsd-milestone-summary

Generate a comprehensive project summary from milestone artifacts for team onboarding and review

7,313 Updated today
open-gsd