interpret-feedback

# Interpret Feedback Run two independent interpretations of third-party feedback in parallel (internal + codex peer), then reconcile into enriched items with clear intent summaries. Designed for feedback where the author's intent is ambiguous or the correctness of suggestions is uncertain. ## Step 1: Identify Feedback Items Determine the feedback to interpret: - If feedback items are in conversation context, use them - If a file path or URL was provided, read or fetch the content - If called by another skill, use the items passed in For each item, collect whatever context is available: code snippets, diffs, surrounding discussion, file paths, line numbers. More context produces better interpretation. ## Step 2: Run Two Interpretations in Parallel Launch two Agent tool calls in a single message (`model: "opus"`, do not set `run_in_background`): ### Internal Interpretation Spawn a subagent with the feedback items and all available context. Instruct it to: 1. Read all referenced code and surrounding context 2. For each feedback item, produce: - **Intent**: What the feedback author most likely wants changed and why (one to two sentences) - **Correctness**: Whether the suggestion is technically sound — flag concerns if the reviewer may be mistaken, with evidence - **Ambiguity**: Note where the intent is unclear or where multiple valid readings exist 3. Return structured results per item ### Run `/peer-review` Skill Spawn a subagent whose prompt includes the fe...